Archivist Page Review

Review parser variants for one source page, compare outputs, and jump directly to the source evidence.

Document: 7 Minnesota #1695

Source page: Open page 111 in document reader

Institution: University of Minnesota | Publisher: University of Minnesota | Year: | Pages: 138

Source URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/891e96c2-d751-4fea-9f35-51fec97c7043/content

Selected Versions

Left: archivist-1.6.68-spark (fragment 954)

Right: archivist-1.0 (fragment 10975)

Next Step

Reprocess/promote controls are the next UI layer. The data foundation is now versioned and diffable.

Page Version Diff

Cultivars Added
  • none
Claims Added
  • La Crescent | description_snippet | One of the plum cultivars evaluated in the study where short-term storage (under 6 months) may not prevent major viability reduction.
  • La Crescent | productivity | Despite reduction, viability declines are framed in the context of practical crossing utility rather than absolute sterility.
  • La Crescent | storage_duration | Pollen stainability decreased significantly after approximately 7 months of storage for ‘La Crescent’.
  • Monitor | productivity | The cultivar remains within the thesis’s broader conclusion that reduced stainability may still permit reproduction.
  • Monitor | storage_duration | Pollen stainability for ‘Monitor’ showed a significant decrease after approximately 7 months in storage.
  • Superior | storage_duration | ‘Superior’ pollen stainability showed a significant decrease after only 3 months of storage.
  • Superior | storage_duration | ‘Superior’ represents a more storage-sensitive outlier versus other examined cultivars.
  • Toka | description_snippet | Plum cultivar cited in conclusions as showing a storage-duration sensitivity beyond short-term storage windows.
  • Toka | storage_duration | ‘Toka’ is one of the plums with significantly lower pollen stainability after about 7 months of storage.
Figures Added
  • none
Citations Added
  • (Anderson and Ascher, 1993)
  • (Brewbaker and Emery, 1962)
  • (Hanna and Towill, 1995)
  • (Kostick, 2016)
Cultivars Removed
  • none
Claims Removed
  • La Crescent | description_snippet | Page context places La Crescent in the plum subset of the winter-hardy Prunus cultivar set.
  • La Crescent | storage_duration | Pollen of La Crescent showed significant stainability decline after seven months in storage.
  • Monitor | source_reference_abbreviation | Statistical change is reported with reference to the study’s Table 2 data.
  • Monitor | storage_duration | Monitor pollen showed significant stainability decline after seven months in storage.
  • Superior | description_snippet | Compared with other tested plum entries, Superior declines earlier under storage in this study.
  • Superior | storage_duration | Superior showed significant pollen stainability decline after only three months in storage.
  • Toka | description_snippet | Toka is treated as a plum cultivar in the winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability evaluation.
  • Toka | storage_duration | Toka had a significant reduction in pollen stainability at seven months of storage.
Figures Removed
  • none
Citations Removed
  • Anderson and Ascher, 1993
  • Anderson and Ascher, 1994
  • Brewbaker and Emery, 1962
  • Hanna and Towill, 1995

Available Page Versions

IDVariantStatusModelSpecializationCountsSourceCompare
359archivist-1.6.68-sparkactivegpt-5.4visual_page_generalist4 cultivars / 8 claims / 0 figuresOpen source page
3401archivist-1.0candidategpt-5.4visual_page_generalist4 cultivars / 9 claims / 0 figuresOpen source pageCompare to active