Cultivar 1424: Zumbra

Taxon ID:

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 1 | Linked Entities (visible): 1 | Evidence claims: 5 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=5 | sources=1 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: description_snippet:3, recommendation_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search

Link Filter: showing all links (including candidate); hidden candidate links=0. Hide candidate links

Wiki Draft

Zumbra is listed in a University of Minnesota cherry-plum pollination bulletin as a sand cherry hybrid in the cherry-plum group. The source gives no fruit description, breeder, release year, or direct parentage. It places Zumbra among commonly grown cherry-plums used for compatibility tests and planting guidance in Minnesota. [S1]

The record is mainly about bloom and pollination, not fruit quality. Zumbra had a late bloom season, good pollen abundance, and a fair pollinizer rating across tests with 14 varieties. [S1] It was one of 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show pollinizer interactions. [S1]

The bulletin notes that cherry-plums can have specific compatibility needs, so success with one variety does not prove success with another. [S1] In this context, Zumbra's value is practical. It appears in a tested pollination network for northern plantings, where bloom overlap with plums and cherry-plums could affect fruit set. [S1]

The source states no hardiness zone for Zumbra. Its northern context comes from the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station bulletin and its discussion of cherry-plum pollination in northern latitudes. [S1] The packet also records Zumbra as a good pollinizer for Sapa. The supplied source material does not support broader claims about fruit, storage, disease resistance, or tree habit.

Summary source basis

This summary currently draws chiefly from Pollination Studies with Stone Fruits, with 2 additional supporting sources linked below.

Featured source descriptions

“Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm, 1920, a sister of Nicollet.”
[3]
“cherry plum”
[2]

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

Parentage claim text

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

No sibling cultivars surfaced from source quotes yet.

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone MinZone MaxZone TextAssertion TypeOutcomeLocationConfidence
No explicit zone assertion rows yet.

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

DocumentTitle/URLRightsClaimsRelationshipsHistory EventsPagesSnippets
112Pollination Studies with Stone Fruitsunknown510p7Included in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.; Pollen abundance is good.; Season of bloom is late.; Rated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 14 varieties.

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

DocumentPageClaim TypeClaimQuoteMatch
112p7recommendation_contextIncluded in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.Zumbra 14 F Late Good Sand cherry hybridpage_block:0.90
112p7description_snippetPollen abundance is good.Zumbra 14 F Late Good Sand cherry hybridpage_block:0.90
112p7description_snippetSeason of bloom is late.Zumbra 14 F Late Good Sand cherry hybridpage_block:0.90
112p7description_snippetRated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 14 varieties.Zumbra 14 F Late Good Sand cherry hybridpage_block:0.90
112p7entry_pedigreeDescribed as a sand cherry hybrid.Zumbra 14 F Late Good Sand cherry hybridpage_block:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

YearNurseryCatalog IssueRelation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

RelationTypeIDLabel
pollinizer_good_forcultivar158Sapa

Evidence Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
recommendation_contextIncluded in the selected 11 commonly grown cherry-plum varieties used to show intercompatibility.0.90
description_snippetPollen abundance is good.0.93
description_snippetSeason of bloom is late.0.93
description_snippetRated fair as a pollinizer in tests on 14 varieties.0.95
entry_pedigreeDescribed as a sand cherry hybrid.0.95

History Events

IDTypeYearLabel
No history events.