Taxon ID:
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 2 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=2 | sources=1 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: anecdote_snippet:1, description_snippet:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search
Link Filter: showing all links (including candidate); hidden candidate links=0. Hide candidate links
P. Nigra appears here as Prunus nigra in a University of Minnesota table comparing greenhouse and field germination results. In Experiment I, its reported correlation was -0.67 and not significant. It was not examined in Experiment II because there was not enough seed set [S1].
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from Minnesota #1695.
Featured source descriptions
“Prunus nigra had Experiment Icorrelation -0.67 (not significant); Experiment II was not examined due to lack of seed set.”
— [1]
“Footnote states explicitly that Prunus nigra was not examined in Experiment II because of lack of seed set.”
— [1]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No explicit zone assertion rows yet. | ||||||
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Minnesota #1695 | unknown | 2 | 0 | 0 | p99 | Footnote states explicitly that Prunus nigra was not examined in Experiment II because of lack of seed set.; Prunus nigra had Experiment I correlation -0.67 (not significant); Experiment II was not examined due to lack o |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | p99 | anecdote_snippet | Footnote states explicitly that Prunus nigra was not examined in Experiment II because of lack of seed set. | P. nigra -0.67 ns _Z P. nigra was not examined in Experiment II due to lack of seed set | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p99 | description_snippet | Prunus nigra had Experiment Icorrelation -0.67 (not significant); Experiment II was not examined due to lack of seed set. | P. nigra -0.67 ns _Z P. nigra was not examined in Experiment II due to lack of seed set | page_block:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| anecdote_snippet | Footnote states explicitly that Prunus nigra was not examined in Experiment II because of lack of seed set. | 0.99 |
| description_snippet | Prunus nigra had Experiment I correlation -0.67 (not significant); Experiment II was not examined due to lack of seed set. | 0.99 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||