Taxon ID:
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 8 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=8 | sources=1 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: description_snippet:6, source_reference_abbreviation:1, storage_duration:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search
Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links
Surecrop is listed as a tart cherry cultivar in a University of Minnesota source, with its introduction year marked unknown. The entry gives pollen collection week 18 and no citation, marked as not available [S1].
In pollen stainability results, Surecrop had an initial value of 90%, the highest end of the tart cherry cultivars shown there. The source states that Northstar differed significantly from Surecrop for initial stainability [S1].
Across storage months, Surecrop often had the highest average pollen stainability among the tart cherries and differed significantly from several other cultivars, except Suda. Its reported stainability values were 90%, 95%, 91%, 92%, 92%, 78%, 85%, 76%, 79%, and 85% from 0 through 9 months, with significant month-to-month variation but no consistent linear decline [S1].
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from Minnesota #1695.
Featured source descriptions
“Surecrop often had the highest average pollen stainability among tart cherries and differed significantly from multiple other tart cherry cultivars except Suda.”
— [1]
“Surecrop had initial pollen stainability reported at 90%, the high end of the tart cherry cultivars listed on this page (Table 2).”
— [1]
“Cultivar Surecrop is listed with unknown introduction year, pollen collection week 18, and no citation (NA).”
— [1]
“Surecrop showed significant variation across months and no consistent linear decline in stainability.”
— [1]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No explicit zone assertion rows yet. | ||||||
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Minnesota #1695 | unknown | 8 | 0 | 0 | p106 p107 p118 p122 | The same row includes compact group letters (A-E, AB, A-C, A-E, A-E, B-D, A-F, C-G, D-G, A-F) corresponding to the same month columns.; Surecrop shows table-reported storage values of 90%, 95%, 91%, 92%, 92%, 78%, 85%, 7 |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | p122 | description_snippet | The same row includes compact group letters (A-E, AB, A-C, A-E, A-E, B-D, A-F, C-G, D-G, A-F) corresponding to the same month columns. | 'Surecrop' 90% A-E 95% AB 91% A-C 92% A-E 92% A-E 78% B-D 85% A-F 76% C-G 79% D-G 85% A-F | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p122 | storage_duration | Surecrop shows table-reported storage values of 90%, 95%, 91%, 92%, 92%, 78%, 85%, 76%, 79%, and 85% at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months respectively. | 'Surecrop' 90% A-E 95% AB 91% A-C 92% A-E 92% A-E 78% B-D 85% A-F 76% C-G 79% D-G 85% A-F | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p118 | source_reference_abbreviation | Citation is marked NA for this entry. | 'Surecrop' Unknown Week 18 NA | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p118 | description_snippet | Cultivar Surecrop is listed with unknown introduction year, pollen collection week 18, and no citation (NA). | 'Surecrop' Unknown Week 18 NA | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p107 | description_snippet | Surecrop showed significant variation across months and no consistent linear decline in stainability. | When there was variation among tart cherry cultivars, ‘Surecrop’ often had the highest average % stainability and differed significantly from one or more of the other tart cherry cultivars with the exception of ‘Suda’ .. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p107 | description_snippet | Surecrop often had the highest average pollen stainability among tart cherries and differed significantly from multiple other tart cherry cultivars except Suda. | When there was variation among tart cherry cultivars, ‘Surecrop’ often had the highest average % stainability and differed significantly from one or more of the other tart cherry cultivars with the exception of ‘Suda’ .. | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p106 | description_snippet | Surecrop was explicitly stated to differ significantly from Northstar in initial stainability. | Initial % stainability for tart cherry cultivars ranged from 69% for 'Northstar' to 90% for 'Surecrop'. The tart cherry 'Northstar' differed significantly from 'Surecrop' (Table 2). | page_block:0.90 |
| 7 | p106 | description_snippet | Surecrop had initial pollen stainability reported at 90%, the high end of the tart cherry cultivars listed on this page (Table 2). | Initial % stainability for tart cherry cultivars ranged from 69% for 'Northstar' to 90% for 'Surecrop'. The tart cherry 'Northstar' differed significantly from 'Surecrop' (Table 2). | page_block:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| description_snippet | The same row includes compact group letters (A-E, AB, A-C, A-E, A-E, B-D, A-F, C-G, D-G, A-F) corresponding to the same month columns. | 0.88 |
| storage_duration | Surecrop shows table-reported storage values of 90%, 95%, 91%, 92%, 92%, 78%, 85%, 76%, 79%, and 85% at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months respectively. | 0.95 |
| source_reference_abbreviation | Citation is marked NA for this entry. | 0.98 |
| description_snippet | Cultivar Surecrop is listed with unknown introduction year, pollen collection week 18, and no citation (NA). | 0.97 |
| description_snippet | Surecrop showed significant variation across months and no consistent linear decline in stainability. | 0.90 |
| description_snippet | Surecrop often had the highest average pollen stainability among tart cherries and differed significantly from multiple other tart cherry cultivars except Suda. | 0.92 |
| description_snippet | Surecrop was explicitly stated to differ significantly from Northstar in initial stainability. | 0.93 |
| description_snippet | Surecrop had initial pollen stainability reported at 90%, the high end of the tart cherry cultivars listed on this page (Table 2). | 0.95 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||