Taxon ID:
Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no
Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 10 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0
Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON
Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=10 | sources=1 | contradictions=0
Claim Types: recommendation_context:3, description_snippet:2, flavor_profile:1, fruit_color:1, productivity:1, storage_duration:1, taxon_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON
Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search
Link Filter: showing all links (including candidate); hidden candidate links=0. Hide candidate links
Clingstone Wolf is an Americana plum described as the clingstone form long circulated under the name Wolf.[S1] South Dakota station notes say growers eventually recognized that nursery stock sold as Wolf included two distinct varieties: the true Wolf, which is freestone, and a second plum provisionally separated as Clingstone Wolf.[S1] That naming confusion is central to its identity and to how it was remembered.[S1]
The surviving description is practical rather than genealogical. No parentage, breeder, or release history is given here. The bulletin places it among Americana plums grown and judged in the northern plains.[S1] A 1904 Minnesota State Horticultural Society recommendation list mentioned only "Wolf (freestone)," showing that Clingstone Wolf was already being treated as distinct from the preferred Wolf by that date.[S1]
A. Norby described Clingstone Wolf as darker than Freestone Wolf, with large fruit.[S1] He called it a good variety and a good market plum. He said it keeps and carries well and is more exempt from insect injury than most other kinds.[S1] He also described it as exceptionally free from insect injuries or fungus diseases.[S1] Its weak point was quality. Norby rated it only medium and later said it lacks quality.[S1]
Productivity appears respectable but not outstanding. Norby called it moderately productive, but also said it was not as heavy a bearer as Stoddard.[S1] The bulletin gives no fuller tree description, ripening season, or hardiness rating. Its inclusion in a South Dakota bulletin and comparison with other northern plains plums place it in that regional growing context.[S1]
Clingstone Wolf matters less as a celebrated dessert plum than as evidence of how nursery propagation and regional evaluation could split one well known name into two different fruits.[S1] The historical record preserves a marketable, durable, darker fruited Americana plum that was useful enough to be noticed, yet distinct enough in stone type and quality to require its own corrective name.[S1]
Summary source basis
This summary currently draws chiefly from Plums in South Dakota.
Featured source descriptions
“Plum growers found that under propagation in commercial nurseries there were two distinct varieties under the name Wolf; the true Wolf is a freestone and the spurious Wolf is provisionally called Clingstone Wolf.”
— [1]
“A. Norby reported the fruit runs large and is more exempt from insect injuries than most other kinds.”
— [1]
“A. Norby rated it as only medium quality and later said it lacks quality.”
— [1]
“A. Norby wrote that it was not as heavy a bearer as Stoddard.”
— [1]
Direct parent cultivars
Parentage claim text
Derived or downstream cultivar links
Source-story quotations
Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.
Related cultivars mentioned in source context
Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.
| Zone Min | Zone Max | Zone Text | Assertion Type | Outcome | Location | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No explicit zone assertion rows yet. | ||||||
No linked media assets.
| Document | Title/URL | Rights | Claims | Relationships | History Events | Pages | Snippets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Plums in South Dakota | unknown | 10 | 0 | 0 | p14 | A. Norby described it in 1904 as a good market plum, exceptionally free from insect injuries or fungus diseases, and moderately productive.; A. Norby rated it as only medium quality and later said it lacks quality.; A. N |
| Document | Page | Claim Type | Claim | Quote | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | p14 | recommendation_context | A. Norby described it in 1904 as a good market plum, exceptionally free from insect injuries or fungus diseases, and moderately productive. | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | flavor_profile | A. Norby rated it as only medium quality and later said it lacks quality. | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | storage_duration | A. Norby wrote that it keeps and carries well. | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | description_snippet | A. Norby reported the fruit runs large and is more exempt from insect injuries than most other kinds. | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | productivity | A. Norby wrote that it was not as heavy a bearer as Stoddard. | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | recommendation_context | A. Norby called it a good variety. | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | fruit_color | A. Norby described it as of darker color than Freestone Wolf. | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | recommendation_context | In December 1904, the Minnesota State Horticultural Society recommended fruit list mentioned only the "Wolf (freestone)." | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | description_snippet | Plum growers found that under propagation in commercial nurseries there were two distinct varieties under the name Wolf; the true Wolf is a freestone and the spurious Wolf is provi | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| 17 | p14 | taxon_context | Listed as an Americana plum. | Clingstone Wolf, Americana. | page_block:0.90 |
| Year | Nursery | Catalog Issue | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No catalog issue offerings linked. | |||
| Relation | Type | ID | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No linked entities at this filter level. | |||
| Type | Claim | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| recommendation_context | A. Norby described it in 1904 as a good market plum, exceptionally free from insect injuries or fungus diseases, and moderately productive. | 0.90 |
| flavor_profile | A. Norby rated it as only medium quality and later said it lacks quality. | 0.89 |
| storage_duration | A. Norby wrote that it keeps and carries well. | 0.88 |
| description_snippet | A. Norby reported the fruit runs large and is more exempt from insect injuries than most other kinds. | 0.86 |
| productivity | A. Norby wrote that it was not as heavy a bearer as Stoddard. | 0.87 |
| recommendation_context | A. Norby called it a good variety. | 0.83 |
| fruit_color | A. Norby described it as of darker color than Freestone Wolf. | 0.88 |
| recommendation_context | In December 1904, the Minnesota State Horticultural Society recommended fruit list mentioned only the "Wolf (freestone)." | 0.90 |
| description_snippet | Plum growers found that under propagation in commercial nurseries there were two distinct varieties under the name Wolf; the true Wolf is a freestone and the spurious Wolf is provisionally called Clingstone Wolf. | 0.95 |
| taxon_context | Listed as an Americana plum. | 0.99 |
| ID | Type | Year | Label |
|---|---|---|---|
| No history events. | |||