Cultivar 392: Clingstone Wolf

Taxon ID:

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 10 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=10 | sources=1 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: recommendation_context:3, description_snippet:2, flavor_profile:1, fruit_color:1, productivity:1, storage_duration:1, taxon_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search

Link Filter: showing all links (including candidate); hidden candidate links=0. Hide candidate links

Wiki Draft

Clingstone Wolf is an Americana plum described as the clingstone form long circulated under the name Wolf.[S1] South Dakota station notes say growers eventually recognized that nursery stock sold as Wolf included two distinct varieties: the true Wolf, which is freestone, and a second plum provisionally separated as Clingstone Wolf.[S1] That naming confusion is central to its identity and to how it was remembered.[S1]

The surviving description is practical rather than genealogical. No parentage, breeder, or release history is given here. The bulletin places it among Americana plums grown and judged in the northern plains.[S1] A 1904 Minnesota State Horticultural Society recommendation list mentioned only "Wolf (freestone)," showing that Clingstone Wolf was already being treated as distinct from the preferred Wolf by that date.[S1]

A. Norby described Clingstone Wolf as darker than Freestone Wolf, with large fruit.[S1] He called it a good variety and a good market plum. He said it keeps and carries well and is more exempt from insect injury than most other kinds.[S1] He also described it as exceptionally free from insect injuries or fungus diseases.[S1] Its weak point was quality. Norby rated it only medium and later said it lacks quality.[S1]

Productivity appears respectable but not outstanding. Norby called it moderately productive, but also said it was not as heavy a bearer as Stoddard.[S1] The bulletin gives no fuller tree description, ripening season, or hardiness rating. Its inclusion in a South Dakota bulletin and comparison with other northern plains plums place it in that regional growing context.[S1]

Clingstone Wolf matters less as a celebrated dessert plum than as evidence of how nursery propagation and regional evaluation could split one well known name into two different fruits.[S1] The historical record preserves a marketable, durable, darker fruited Americana plum that was useful enough to be noticed, yet distinct enough in stone type and quality to require its own corrective name.[S1]

Summary source basis

This summary currently draws chiefly from Plums in South Dakota.

Featured source descriptions

“Plum growers found that under propagation in commercial nurseries there were two distinct varieties under the name Wolf; the true Wolf is a freestone and the spurious Wolf is provisionally called Clingstone Wolf.”
[1]
“A. Norby reported the fruit runs large and is more exempt from insect injuries than most other kinds.”
[1]
“A. Norby rated it as only medium quality and later said it lacks quality.”
[1]
“A. Norby wrote that it was not as heavy a bearer as Stoddard.”
[1]

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

Parentage claim text

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

No sibling cultivars surfaced from source quotes yet.

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone MinZone MaxZone TextAssertion TypeOutcomeLocationConfidence
No explicit zone assertion rows yet.

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

DocumentTitle/URLRightsClaimsRelationshipsHistory EventsPagesSnippets
17Plums in South Dakotaunknown1000p14A. Norby described it in 1904 as a good market plum, exceptionally free from insect injuries or fungus diseases, and moderately productive.; A. Norby rated it as only medium quality and later said it lacks quality.; A. N

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

DocumentPageClaim TypeClaimQuoteMatch
17p14recommendation_contextA. Norby described it in 1904 as a good market plum, exceptionally free from insect injuries or fungus diseases, and moderately productive.Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14flavor_profileA. Norby rated it as only medium quality and later said it lacks quality.Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14storage_durationA. Norby wrote that it keeps and carries well.Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14description_snippetA. Norby reported the fruit runs large and is more exempt from insect injuries than most other kinds.Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14productivityA. Norby wrote that it was not as heavy a bearer as Stoddard.Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14recommendation_contextA. Norby called it a good variety.Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14fruit_colorA. Norby described it as of darker color than Freestone Wolf.Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14recommendation_contextIn December 1904, the Minnesota State Horticultural Society recommended fruit list mentioned only the "Wolf (freestone)."Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14description_snippetPlum growers found that under propagation in commercial nurseries there were two distinct varieties under the name Wolf; the true Wolf is a freestone and the spurious Wolf is proviClingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p14taxon_contextListed as an Americana plum.Clingstone Wolf, Americana.page_block:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

YearNurseryCatalog IssueRelation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

RelationTypeIDLabel
No linked entities at this filter level.

Evidence Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
recommendation_contextA. Norby described it in 1904 as a good market plum, exceptionally free from insect injuries or fungus diseases, and moderately productive.0.90
flavor_profileA. Norby rated it as only medium quality and later said it lacks quality.0.89
storage_durationA. Norby wrote that it keeps and carries well.0.88
description_snippetA. Norby reported the fruit runs large and is more exempt from insect injuries than most other kinds.0.86
productivityA. Norby wrote that it was not as heavy a bearer as Stoddard.0.87
recommendation_contextA. Norby called it a good variety.0.83
fruit_colorA. Norby described it as of darker color than Freestone Wolf.0.88
recommendation_contextIn December 1904, the Minnesota State Horticultural Society recommended fruit list mentioned only the "Wolf (freestone)."0.90
description_snippetPlum growers found that under propagation in commercial nurseries there were two distinct varieties under the name Wolf; the true Wolf is a freestone and the spurious Wolf is provisionally called Clingstone Wolf.0.95
taxon_contextListed as an Americana plum.0.99

History Events

IDTypeYearLabel
No history events.