Cultivar 435: Old Gold

Taxon ID:

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 9 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=9 | sources=1 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: description_snippet:3, breeder_reference:1, flavor_profile:1, fruit_color:1, fruit_size:1, taxon_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search

Link Filter: showing all links (including candidate); hidden candidate links=0. Hide candidate links

Wiki Draft

Old Gold is an Americana plum introduced by C. W. H. Heideman of Minnesota. [S1] It appears in South Dakota fruit lists by the late 1890s, and one bulletin says it had already fruited locally. [S2] This places it in the early northern prairie record for named yellow plums, not just as a brief catalog mention. [S1] [S2]

South Dakota station notes say two trees received from the introducer in 1895 grew well but were light bearers. [S1] The fruit was described there as medium to large and yellow, ripening on September 7 in both 1903 and 1904. [S1] A Madison grower, A. Norby, called it the finest yellow variety he had seen, with medium size and fair quality. [S2] The station bulletin was less favorable and rated its quality poor. [S1] Sources disagree on eating quality, calling it fair or poor. [S1] [S2]

The surviving record suggests Old Gold was valued mainly for its yellow fruit and its place in hardy prairie plum plantings, not for heavy crops. [S1] It fruited in South Dakota conditions, and the station trees showed good growth, but the main production note is that they were light bearers. [S1] These excerpts do not state hardiness directly, so the clearest evidence is that it was grown and fruited under South Dakota conditions in this period. [S1] [S2]

Disease is the clearest caution attached to Old Gold. In 1903 it was reported as the only variety in the station orchard severely attacked by shot hole, or leaf spot fungus, and H. C. Warner of Forestburg also called it subject to shot hole fungus. [S1] This mix of yellow fruit, modest productivity, and notable disease susceptibility may help explain why it is remembered more as a documented regional cultivar than as a widely praised plum. [S1]

Summary source basis

This summary currently draws chiefly from Plums in South Dakota, with 1 additional supporting sources linked below.

Featured source descriptions

“Two trees received from the introducer in 1895 have made a good growth, but are light bearers.”
[1]
“"Subject to shot hole fungus." (H. C. Warner, Forestburg, S. D. 1903.)”
[1]
“1903 ripe September 7; 1904 September 7.”
[1]
“In 1903 this was the only variety in the orchard that was severely attacked by the shot-hole, or leaf spot fungus.”
[1]

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

Parentage claim text

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

No sibling cultivars surfaced from source quotes yet.

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone MinZone MaxZone TextAssertion TypeOutcomeLocationConfidence
No explicit zone assertion rows yet.

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

DocumentTitle/URLRightsClaimsRelationshipsHistory EventsPagesSnippets
17Plums in South Dakotaunknown900p31"Subject to shot hole fungus." (H. C. Warner, Forestburg, S. D. 1903.); In 1903 this was the only variety in the orchard that was severely attacked by the shot-hole, or leaf spot fungus.; 1903 ripe September 7; 1904 Sept

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

DocumentPageClaim TypeClaimQuoteMatch
17p31description_snippet"Subject to shot hole fungus." (H. C. Warner, Forestburg, S. D. 1903.)Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p31entry_hardiness_observationIn 1903 this was the only variety in the orchard that was severely attacked by the shot-hole, or leaf spot fungus.Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p31description_snippet1903 ripe September 7; 1904 September 7.Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p31flavor_profileQuality poor.Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p31fruit_colorFruit yellow.Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p31fruit_sizeFruit medium to large.Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p31description_snippetTwo trees received from the introducer in 1895 have made a good growth, but are light bearers.Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p31breeder_referenceIntroduced by C. W. H. Heideman, Minnesota.Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p31taxon_contextListed as Americana.Old Gold, Americana.page_block:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

YearNurseryCatalog IssueRelation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

RelationTypeIDLabel
No linked entities at this filter level.

Evidence Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
description_snippet"Subject to shot hole fungus." (H. C. Warner, Forestburg, S. D. 1903.)0.92
entry_hardiness_observationIn 1903 this was the only variety in the orchard that was severely attacked by the shot-hole, or leaf spot fungus.0.93
description_snippet1903 ripe September 7; 1904 September 7.0.96
flavor_profileQuality poor.0.97
fruit_colorFruit yellow.0.98
fruit_sizeFruit medium to large.0.97
description_snippetTwo trees received from the introducer in 1895 have made a good growth, but are light bearers.0.94
breeder_referenceIntroduced by C. W. H. Heideman, Minnesota.0.98
taxon_contextListed as Americana.0.99

History Events

IDTypeYearLabel
No history events.