Cultivar 459: Smith

Taxon ID:

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 13 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=13 | sources=1 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: description_snippet:4, recommendation_context:3, productivity:2, fruit_size:1, taxon_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search

Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links

Wiki Draft

Smith is an Americana plum raised by C. A. Smith in Caroline County, Maryland, from seed of Quaker. A contemporary South Dakota bulletin calls it one of the largest plums of its class, though the station did not grow it in its own orchard and relied on A. Norby's reports. [S1]

Norby's 1902 note describes small trees with a fair crop. The fruit was about one and seven eighths inches across, ripened on September 2, and became quite soft when ripe. [S1]

The record on orchard value is mixed. In 1903, Norby called it only fairly productive and of no special value. In 1904, he described it as a good bearer and said the fruit averaged large. In those same reports, however, he also said it was much subject to curculio and gouger, and in 1904 he added rot. He finally judged it not equal to De Soto. [S1]

In the archive, Smith stands as an eastern Americana plum noted for large fruit, but it seems to have disappointed in Upper Midwest evaluation because of insect injury, rot, and uneven practical value. [S1]

Summary source basis

This summary currently draws chiefly from Plums in South Dakota.

Featured source descriptions

“A. Norby reported in 1902: small trees and fair crop; ripe September 2nd; fruit quite soft.”
[1]
“In 1903 A. Norby reported it was much subject to curculio and gouger.”
[1]
“Said to be one of the largest plums of its class.”
[1]
“In 1903 A. Norby described it as only fairly productive.”
[1]

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

Parentage claim text

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

No sibling cultivars surfaced from source quotes yet.

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone MinZone MaxZone TextAssertion TypeOutcomeLocationConfidence
No explicit zone assertion rows yet.

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

DocumentTitle/URLRightsClaimsRelationshipsHistory EventsPagesSnippets
17Plums in South Dakotaunknown1300p38In 1904 A. Norby judged it not equal to De Soto.; In 1904 A. Norby reported it was much injured by the gouger, curculio and rot.; In 1904 A. Norby described it as a good bearer and averaging large.; In 1903 A. Norby repo

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

DocumentPageClaim TypeClaimQuoteMatch
17p38recommendation_contextIn 1904 A. Norby judged it not equal to De Soto.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38description_snippetIn 1904 A. Norby reported it was much injured by the gouger, curculio and rot.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38productivityIn 1904 A. Norby described it as a good bearer and averaging large.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38description_snippetIn 1903 A. Norby reported it was much subject to curculio and gouger.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38recommendation_contextIn 1903 A. Norby said it was of no special value.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38productivityIn 1903 A. Norby described it as only fairly productive.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38description_snippetA. Norby reported in 1902: small trees and fair crop; ripe September 2nd; fruit quite soft.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38fruit_sizeA. Norby reported fruit size as one and seven-eighths of an inch in 1902.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38recommendation_contextNot in the Station orchard.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38description_snippetSaid to be one of the largest plums of its class.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38entry_locationThe variety originated in Caroline county, Maryland.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38entry_pedigreeOriginated by C. A. Smith, Caroline county, Maryland, from seed of Quaker.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90
17p38taxon_contextSmith is listed as an Americana plum.Smith, Americana.page_block:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

YearNurseryCatalog IssueRelation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

RelationTypeIDLabel
No linked entities at this filter level.

Evidence Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
recommendation_contextIn 1904 A. Norby judged it not equal to De Soto.0.94
description_snippetIn 1904 A. Norby reported it was much injured by the gouger, curculio and rot.0.95
productivityIn 1904 A. Norby described it as a good bearer and averaging large.0.94
description_snippetIn 1903 A. Norby reported it was much subject to curculio and gouger.0.94
recommendation_contextIn 1903 A. Norby said it was of no special value.0.93
productivityIn 1903 A. Norby described it as only fairly productive.0.93
description_snippetA. Norby reported in 1902: small trees and fair crop; ripe September 2nd; fruit quite soft.0.93
fruit_sizeA. Norby reported fruit size as one and seven-eighths of an inch in 1902.0.91
recommendation_contextNot in the Station orchard.0.97
description_snippetSaid to be one of the largest plums of its class.0.89
entry_locationThe variety originated in Caroline county, Maryland.0.95
entry_pedigreeOriginated by C. A. Smith, Caroline county, Maryland, from seed of Quaker.0.96
taxon_contextSmith is listed as an Americana plum.0.98

History Events

IDTypeYearLabel
No history events.