Cultivar 472: Winnebago

Taxon ID:

Usage Facet: class=edible; edible_score=1.0; ornamental_score=0.0; inferred_from_taxon=no

Relationships: 0 | Linked Entities (visible): 0 | Evidence claims: 5 | History events: 0 | Catalog issue offerings: 0

Open profile JSON | Open lineage explorer | Open lineage JSON

Evidence Badge: emerging | claims=5 | sources=1 | contradictions=0

Claim Types: flavor_profile:1, fruit_size:1, productivity:1, recommendation_context:1, taxon_context:1 | Open evidence summary JSON | Open citation drawer JSON

Connected Views: lineage table | lineage graph | history charts | trait matrix | search

Link Filter: showing signal links (candidate hidden); hidden candidate links=0. Show candidate links

Wiki Draft

Winnebago is listed as an Americana plum. In the South Dakota station records, it appears as an established orchard variety, not a new introduction.[S1] The account is brief but clear: four trees in the old orchard, planted in 1888, had been productive, but the variety was not recommended.[S1]

The problem was fruit quality, not bearing. The South Dakota bulletin says the fruit was too small and too poor in quality. That places Winnebago among the productive but unsatisfactory plums in that trial.[S1] This source does not give a fuller description of color, flesh, flavor, season, or culinary use.[S1]

In growing terms, Winnebago was vigorous and hardy enough to stay productive in the Station orchard for many years, but that did not outweigh its poor fruit quality under South Dakota conditions.[S1] The source does not name a breeder, parentage, or place of origin beyond placing it in the Americana group.[S1]

Summary source basis

S1: Plums in South Dakota

This summary currently draws chiefly from Plums in South Dakota.

Featured source descriptions

“Fruit judged too poor in quality.”
— ^[1]

“Four trees in the old Station orchard planted in 1888 have been productive.”
— ^[1]

“Not recommended.”
— ^[1]

Parentage

Direct parent cultivars

No direct linked parent cultivars promoted yet.

Parentage claim text

No direct breeding_cross claim text yet.

Lineage Links

Derived or downstream cultivar links

No derived or downstream lineage links yet.

Story Highlights

Source-story quotations

Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.Plums in South Dakota, p43
Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.Plums in South Dakota, p43
Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.Plums in South Dakota, p43
Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.Plums in South Dakota, p43

Family Navigation

Taxonomy context: No family-tree context surfaced yet.

Related cultivars mentioned in source context

No sibling cultivars surfaced from source quotes yet.

Cold Hardiness

Zone assertions are structured rows. Hardiness claim text appears in evidence claims and page-linked citations.

Zone Min	Zone Max	Zone Text	Assertion Type	Outcome	Location	Confidence
No explicit zone assertion rows yet.

Media Gallery

No linked media assets.

Citation Drawer (Top Supporting Sources)

Document	Title/URL	Rights	Claims	Relationships	History Events	Pages	Snippets
17	Plums in South Dakota	unknown	5	0	0	p43	Not recommended.; Fruit judged too poor in quality.; Fruit is too small in size.; Four trees in the old Station orchard planted in 1888 have been productive.

Citation Evidence (Page-Linked Quotes)

Document	Page	Claim Type	Claim	Quote	Match
17	p43	recommendation_context	Not recommended.	Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.	page_block:0.90
17	p43	flavor_profile	Fruit judged too poor in quality.	Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.	page_block:0.90
17	p43	fruit_size	Fruit is too small in size.	Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.	page_block:0.90
17	p43	productivity	Four trees in the old Station orchard planted in 1888 have been productive.	Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.	page_block:0.90
17	p43	taxon_context	Placed under Americana.	Winnebago, Americana. Four trees of this variety in the old orchard of this Station, planted in 1888, have been productive but the fruit is too small in size and too poor in quality. Not recommended.	page_block:0.90

Nursery Offering Timeline

Year	Nursery	Catalog Issue	Relation
No catalog issue offerings linked.

Linked Entities

Relation	Type	ID	Label
No linked entities at this filter level.

Evidence Claims

Type	Claim	Confidence
recommendation_context	Not recommended.	0.99
flavor_profile	Fruit judged too poor in quality.	0.95
fruit_size	Fruit is too small in size.	0.97
productivity	Four trees in the old Station orchard planted in 1888 have been productive.	0.96
taxon_context	Placed under Americana.	0.98

History Events

ID	Type	Year	Label
No history events.