Juliet Notes: Based on observations in 2008 & 2009

Document 108

Title: Juliet Notes: Based on observations in 2008 & 2009

Source URL: https://research-groups.usask.ca/fruit/documents/cherrys/Juliet-notes.pdf

Archive provenance: discovery_round_01 curated pdf import | institution=University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program | source_root=https://research-groups.usask.ca | local_archive=/usr/local/var/www/pomologica/data/raw/manual/ingest_queue/discovery_round_01_second_corpus/Juliet-notes.pdf

Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 2 | Evidence claims: 71

Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 2

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Saskatchewan Fruit Program

Publisher:

Site:

Year:

Page count:

Type: cultivar observation notes

Metadata source: intake_manifest_v1

Document Assessment

# Document Assessment

This document looks useful, but only parts of it appear to be strong cultivar pages. It still contains cultivar-bearing pages, but they are mostly mixed narrative pages rather than clean directory or table layouts.

The title suggests a summary or notes document rather than a formal release bulletin.

Continue focusing on the likely cultivar pages rather than spending tokens on the whole document.

Relationship Records

ID	Relation	Source	Target	Source Doc
No catalog relationships linked to this document.

History Records

ID	Type	Year	Label
756	year_reference	2004	Year reference 2004
759	release_event	2004	Release event 2004
757	year_reference	2006	Year reference 2006
754	year_reference	2008	Year reference 2008
758	cross_event	2008	usually 4o Bri x higher than Carmine Jewel but that
755	year_reference	2009	Year reference 2009

Document Reader

Parsed Cultivar Detail

Cultivar: Crimson Passion

Pages in document: p1 p2

Entry Snippets

Page	Basis	Snippet
1	explicit_cultivar_reference	injury to Crimson Passion and Romeo were around 15% dieback/ per tree.
2	explicit_cultivar_reference	Every year for 10 years now, Juliet is either the sweetest cherry or a close second to ‘Crimson Passion’.

Raw Parsed Claims

Page	Type	Claim	Confidence
1	entry_hardiness_observation	Crimson Passion had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009.	0.97
2	flavor_profile	Crimson Passion is presented as Juliet's main comparator for sweetness, sometimes ranking ahead of Juliet.	0.89
2	flavor_profile	The author prefers Crimson Passion most because its firmness is reminiscent of a sweet cherry.	0.95

Inherited Context

p1: cherry (Prunus) | Romance Series cherries | Juliet Notes | Productivity | Flowers and Cold hardiness | University of Saskatchewan fruit research context | Romance Series cherry breeding/release context | Saskatchewan, Canada
p2: cherry | Prunus | Romance Series cherries | Fruit Size and Quality | Flavour | University of Saskatchewan fruit program | University of Saskatchewan cherry breeding program | Saskatchewan, Canada

Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to Crimson Passion (ID 311) within document 108. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.

Citation focus: cultivar focus: Crimson Passion (ID 311) | page focus: 2

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

Page	Type	Quote	Claim	Entity	Jump
1	entry_hardiness_observation	injury to Crimson Passion and Romeo were around 15% dieback/ per tree.	Crimson Passion had around 15% dieback per tree in the winter of 2008/2009.	cultivar 311	Open Review parse
2	flavor_profile	Every year for 10 years now, Juliet is either the sweetest cherry or a close second to ‘Crimson Passion’.	Crimson Passion is presented as Juliet's main comparator for sweetness, sometimes ranking ahead of Juliet.	cultivar 311	Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

ID	Cultivar	Evidence / Claims	Link
312	Juliet	34	Open cultivar
308	Carmine Jewel	6	Open cultivar
310	Romeo	3	Open cultivar
311	Crimson Passion	3	Open cultivar
313	Valentine	3	Open cultivar
309	Evans	2	Open cultivar
170	Montmorency	1	Open cultivar
314	Cupid	1	Open cultivar

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 0

History events: 6

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

Status	License	Holder
unknown

Credibility Records

Tier	Score	Assessor	Rationale
tier_3	55	auto	Unclassified domain; requires manual source evaluation

Translation Records

Source Lang	Target Lang	Method	Status	Note
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation ID	Score	Risk	Assessor	Rationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

Status	Visibility	Reviewer	Note
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

Type	Value	Confidence
taxon_keyword	prunus	0.65

Extracted Claims

Type	Claim	Confidence
description_snippet	They pointed out that when you first pop a cherry into your mouth you quickly taste the sweetness, but that if you eat several of the same variety of cherry in a row that the tartn	0.54
description_snippet	Two master gardeners who were assisting with fruit evaluations surprised me when they insisted Juliet was rather tart and they disagreed with the concept of being ‘too sweet’.	0.54
description_snippet	Some growers have suggested that Juliet might be ‘too sweet’ to be good for processing.	0.54
description_snippet	But we have not done taste comparisons between our cherries when used in processed products.	0.54
description_snippet	Personally, I like Crimson Passion the most but that’s because CP has firmness reminiscent of a sweet cherry.	0.54
productivity	Productivity	0.56
ripening_window	ripen its fruit the longer there is potential for it to	0.56
ripening_window	ripening variety like CJ	0.56
ripening_window	ripening tends to swell the	0.56
storage_duration	keep it adapted for	0.56
flavor_profile	taste the	0.57
flavor_profile	taste comparisons between	0.57
release_year_reference	2004	0.68
breeding_cross	usually 4o Bri x higher than Carmine Jewel but that	0.65
year_reference	2006	0.55
year_reference	2004	0.55
year_reference	2009	0.55
year_reference	2008	0.55