Archivist Page Review

Review parser variants for one source page, compare outputs, and jump directly to the source evidence.

Document: 15 The Western Sand Cherry

Source page: Open page 40 in document reader

Institution: Open PRAIRIE | Publisher: | Year: | Pages: 65

Source URL: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1086&context=agexperimentsta_bulletins

Selected Versions

Left: archivist-1.0 (fragment 3510)

Right: archivist-1.0 (fragment 11221)

Next Step

Reprocess/promote controls are the next UI layer. The data foundation is now versioned and diffable.

Page Version Diff

Cultivars Added

none

Claims Added

Dwarf Rocky Mountain | description_snippet | Dwarf Rocky Mountain cherries did not average better than unselected Dakota Sand Cherry seedlings.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | description_snippet | In southeastern Minnesota it had been seriously attacked by fungus growths, including mildew, twig blight, fruit rot, and pockets.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | entry_hardiness_observation | Mr. Harris answered that the Dwarf Rocky Mountain Cherry was, as far as known, reasonably hardy in Minnesota.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | entry_location | The cited observation concerns Minnesota, especially soil conditions in southeastern Minnesota.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | flavor_profile | A few plants produced fruit that was quite palatable, while others were so acrid as to be scarcely edible.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | fruit_size | A few plants produced fruit nearly as large as Early Richmond cherry, though this was not general for the seedling material.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | productivity | From observation and experience with several hundred plants, Mr. Harris had not seen a plant producing fruit that appeared to have commercial value.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | productivity | Mr. Harris reported knowing of only one fair crop of fruit in five years.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | recommendation_context | The editorial question reports nursery agents representing the fruit as large as Early Richmond and asks whether the plants are reliable and worth buying.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | recommendation_context | The page says this fruit was praised beyond its merits, sold at exorbitant prices, and sometimes involved substitution of other fruits on delivery.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | selection_origin_reference | The page treats Dwarf Rocky Mountain Cherry material as seedling material rather than a uniform named selection, stating that plants fruited in many places appeared to be seedlings only.
Early Richmond | culinary_use | Neighbor-page context indicates Early Richmond is treated as one of the pie cherries in the continuing answer.
Early Richmond | fruit_size | Nursery agents were said to represent Rocky Mountain Cherry fruit as large as Early Richmond; Mr. Harris said only a few plants produced fruit nearly as large as Early Richmond cherry.
Early Richmond | recommendation_context | Early Richmond is used as the comparison cherry in a question asking whether Rocky Mountain Cherry should be planted in preference to it or other cherry trees.

Figures Added

none

Citations Added

Farm, Stock and Home, August 1, 1899.

Cultivars Removed

none

Claims Removed

Dwarf Rocky Mountain | description_snippet | After general introduction, this fruit is said to have suffered the fate of many novelties by being praised far beyond its merits and sold at exorbitant prices.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | description_snippet | As fruited in many places, the Dwarf Rocky Mountain cherries appeared to be seedlings only.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | entry_hardiness_observation | A quoted Minnesota reply says the Dwarf Rocky Mountain Cherry is reasonably hardy in Minnesota.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | entry_hardiness_observation | In southeastern Minnesota it had been seriously attacked by mildew, twig blight, fruit rot, and pockets.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | flavor_profile | Some fruit was reported quite palatable, while others were so acrid as to be scarcely edible.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | fruit_size | Some plants had produced fruit nearly as large as the Early Richmond cherry.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | productivity | The quoted reply says they did not know of its producing but one fair crop of fruit in five years.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | recommendation_context | The page states that these seedlings did not average any better than the average run of unselected Dakota Sand Cherry seedlings.
Dwarf Rocky Mountain | recommendation_context | The plant is characterized as interesting for experimentation, but not shown here as having clear commercial value.
Early Richmond | culinary_use | The next-page continuation implies Early Richmond is treated as one of the pie cherries that should not be displaced by this novelty.
Early Richmond | fruit_size | A few plants of the Dwarf Rocky Mountain Cherry reportedly produced fruit nearly as large as the Early Richmond cherry.
Early Richmond | fruit_size | Agents were said to represent the Rocky Mountain Cherry fruit as large as the Early Richmond.
Early Richmond | recommendation_context | Early Richmond is used as the standard comparator against which the Dwarf Rocky Mountain Cherry was being marketed.

Figures Removed

none

Citations Removed

*Farm, Stock and Home, August 1, 1899.

Available Page Versions

ID	Variant	Status	Model	Specialization	Counts	Source	Compare
684	archivist-1.0	active	gpt-5.4	visual_page_generalist	2 cultivars / 13 claims / 0 figures	Open source page
3558	archivist-1.0	candidate	gpt-5.4	visual_page_generalist	2 cultivars / 14 claims / 0 figures	Open source page	Compare to active