Archivist Page Review

Review parser variants for one source page, compare outputs, and jump directly to the source evidence.

Document: 7 Minnesota #1695

Source page: Open page 107 in document reader

Institution: University of Minnesota | Publisher: University of Minnesota | Year: | Pages: 138

Source URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/891e96c2-d751-4fea-9f35-51fec97c7043/content

Selected Versions

Left: archivist-1.6.68-spark (fragment 950)

Right: archivist-1.0 (fragment 10971)

Next Step

Reprocess/promote controls are the next UI layer. The data foundation is now versioned and diffable.

Page Version Diff

Cultivars Added

Gracious

Claims Added

Bali | description_snippet | Bali was explicitly grouped with Mesabi and N87155 for stable-month behavior in this assay.
Bali | entry_pedigree | No significant month-to-month variation in average stainability for Bali over the storage period.
Compass | description_snippet | Compass is part of the plum cultivar set contributing to significant variation in average stainability.
Compass | description_snippet | Plum cultivars on this page are described as maintaining high averages (all >=48%, six cultivars >=70%) across the study period.
Gracious | description_snippet | Gracious was included in the group with significant but inconsistent variation in Table 2.
La Crescent | description_snippet | La Crescent differed significantly from Mount Royal in pollen stainability.
La Crescent | source_reference_abbreviation | Documented under Table 2.
Mesabi | description_snippet | Mesabi showed no significant month effect on average % stainability across storage.
Mesabi | source_reference_abbreviation | Result appears in Table 2.
Meteor | description_snippet | Meteor showed significant variation across months but lacked a consistent linear decline in stainability.
Mount Royal | description_snippet | Mount Royal showed significant but inconsistent variation signals in the cited cultivar comparison.
Mount Royal | description_snippet | Mount Royal was significantly different from La Crescent and Superior in pollen stainability.
Mount Royal | source_reference_abbreviation | These comparisons are reported in Table 2.
Nb7155 | description_snippet | N87155 displayed no significant monthly variation in average stainability during storage.
Northstar | description_snippet | Northstar had month-to-month differences in stainability and did not decline in a consistent linear pattern.
South Dakota | description_snippet | South Dakota was significantly different from Toka in pollen stainability outcomes.
South Dakota | source_reference_abbreviation | Result is cited to Table 2.
Suda | description_snippet | Suda was the exception in some pairwise differences where Surecrop did not differ from it.
Suda | description_snippet | Suda was treated as a tart cherry comparator and often grouped with Northstar/others where variation existed.
Suda | entry_location | Referenced in the tart cherry comparison section with non-linear month-to-month dynamics.

Figures Added

none

Citations Added

none

Cultivars Removed

none

Claims Removed

Bali | description_snippet | Bali showed no significant month-to-month variation in average pollen stainability over storage.
Compass | description_snippet | Compass appears in the plum section of the stainability results; full within-page text for this cultivar is truncated.
La Crescent | description_snippet | La Crescent was significantly different from Mount Royal in the Table 2 pollen stainability comparison.
Mesabi | description_snippet | Mesabi showed no significant variation in average pollen stainability among months in storage.
Meteor | description_snippet | Meteor displayed significant monthly variation and did not show a consistent linear decline in stainability over time.
Mount Royal | description_snippet | Mount Royal was included in the set where Superior and La Crescent were reported as significantly different from it.
Nb7155 | description_snippet | N87155 showed no significant variation in average pollen stainability among different months in storage.
Northstar | description_snippet | Northstar displayed significant variation and lacked a consistent linear decrease in stainability across storage months.
South Dakota | description_snippet | South Dakota was part of a significant pairwise difference with Toka in Table 2.
Suda | description_snippet | Suda was an exception in tart-cherry comparisons where Surecrop did not differ significantly from it, and it also showed significant month-to-month variation with no consistent linear decline.
Superior | description_snippet | Superior was significantly different than Mount Royal for pollen stainability in Table 2.
Surecrop | description_snippet | Surecrop often had the highest average pollen stainability among tart cherries and differed significantly from multiple other tart cherry cultivars except Suda.
Surecrop | description_snippet | Surecrop showed significant variation across months and no consistent linear decline in stainability.
Toka | description_snippet | Toka showed a significant difference from South Dakota in average percentage stainability (Table 2).

Figures Removed

none

Citations Removed

none

Available Page Versions

ID	Variant	Status	Model	Specialization	Counts	Source	Compare
355	archivist-1.6.68-spark	active	gpt-5.4	visual_page_generalist	13 cultivars / 14 claims / 0 figures	Open source page
3397	archivist-1.0	candidate	gpt-5.4	visual_page_generalist	14 cultivars / 27 claims / 0 figures	Open source page	Compare to active