Archivist Page Review

Review parser variants for one source page, compare outputs, and jump directly to the source evidence.

Document: 7 Minnesota #1695

Source page: Open page 112 in document reader

Institution: University of Minnesota | Publisher: University of Minnesota | Year: | Pages: 138

Source URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/891e96c2-d751-4fea-9f35-51fec97c7043/content

Left: archivist-1.6.68-spark (fragment 955)

Right: archivist-1.0 (fragment 10978)

Reprocess/promote controls are the next UI layer. The data foundation is now versioned and diffable.

Cultivars Added

Claims Added

Monitor | description_snippet | Monitor was explicitly identified as one of the two plum cultivars that did not follow the >50% stainability result at experiment end.
Superior | description_snippet | Superior was explicitly identified as one of the two plum cultivars that did not follow the >50% stainability result at experiment end.

Figures Added

Citations Added

Cultivars Removed

Claims Removed

Monitor | description_snippet | Monitor is a plum cultivar named in the winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not retain more than 50 percent stainability at the end of the storage experi
Monitor | entry_hardiness_observation | Monitor's pollen longevity in storage appears lower than the page-level majority, while many cultivars remained above 50 percent stainability over approximately nine months.
Monitor | source_reference_abbreviation | Primary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and Pollen Viability.
Superior | description_snippet | Superior is a plum cultivar named in the same pollen stainability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not stay above 50 percent stainability at experiment end.
Superior | entry_hardiness_observation | Superior appears to have lower retained pollen stainability relative to the majority group after nine months of storage.
Superior | source_reference_abbreviation | Primary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and Pollen Viability.

Figures Removed

Citations Removed

Akihama, T., and M. Omura. 1986. Preservation of fruit tree pollen, p. 101-112. In: Bajaj, Y. P. S. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry 1: Trees I. Springer, Berlin.
Anderson, N. O., and P. D. Ascher. 1993. Male and female fertility of Loostrife (Lythrum) cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 118: 851-858.
Anderson, N. O., and P. D. Ascher. 1994. Clonal decline in horticultural crops due to Muller’s ratchet. HortScience 29:435.
Asma, B. M. 2008. Determination of pollen viability, germination ratios and morphology of eight apricot cultivars. African Journal of Biotechnology 7: 4269-4273.
Bolat, I., and L. Pirlak. 1999. An investigation on poll ...
Hanna and Towill, 1995. Preservation of pollen allows for outcrossing and germplasm exchange discussions.

ID	Variant	Status	Model	Specialization	Counts	Source	Compare
360	archivist-1.6.68-spark	active	gpt-5.4	visual_page_generalist	2 cultivars / 6 claims / 0 figures	Open source page
3402	archivist-1.0	candidate	gpt-5.4	visual_page_generalist	2 cultivars / 2 claims / 0 figures	Open source page	Compare to active