Dashboard Explore Search Sources Source Graph Ingest Rights Review Translations Translation QA Publish Review Publish Export Revisit Campaigns History History Conflicts History Arbitration Review Queue Charts Taxa Taxonomy Tree Cultivars Lineage Lab Climate Breeders Institutions Programs Compare Compare Tray Trait Matrix Names Nurseries Nurseries+Catalogs Catalog Issues Archivist Resolution Contradictions Arbitration About API Docs

Minnesota #1695

Document 7

Title: Minnesota #1695

Source URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/891e96c2-d751-4fea-9f35-51fec97c7043/content

Archive provenance: training-candidate-full-doc-no-ocr

Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 1 | Evidence claims: 400

Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 109

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Minnesota

Publisher: University of Minnesota

Site: University of Minnesota Conservancy

Year:

Page count: 138

Type: dissertation

Metadata source: intake_backfill_v1

Relationship Records

IDRelationSourceTargetSource Doc
No catalog relationships linked to this document.

History Records

IDTypeYearLabel
118year_reference1926Year reference 1926
116year_reference1941Year reference 1941
126year_reference1993Year reference 1993
122year_reference1994Year reference 1994
128year_reference1996Year reference 1996
125year_reference2001Year reference 2001
129year_reference2004Year reference 2004
124year_reference2008Year reference 2008
117year_reference2009Year reference 2009
121year_reference2011Year reference 2011
123year_reference2012Year reference 2012
127year_reference2013Year reference 2013
119year_reference2014Year reference 2014
120year_reference2015Year reference 2015
135release_event2015Release event 2015
115year_reference2016Year reference 2016
130cross_event2016and cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I
131cross_event2016environments of E x periment I
132cross_event2016Greenhouse environment of E x periment I
133cross_event2016germination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus
134cross_event2016germination in the field environments of E x periments I or II
136selection_origin_eventSelection origin China not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al
137selection_origin_eventSelection origin Europe to North America to
138selection_origin_eventSelection origin western Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P

Document Reader

Reviewable cultivar from this document:

This selector is limited to cultivars that already have staging pages. Additional parsed names stay in the linked records table below.

56 additional parsed names from this document do not have staging cultivar pages yet.

Parsed Cultivar Detail

Cultivar: La Crescent

Pages in document: p14 p46 p80 p101 p107 p108 p109 p111 p118

Entry Snippets

PageBasisSnippet
14explicit_cultivar_referenceThe University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985.
46explicit_cultivar_referenceThe range in average % germination for plum cultivars' scarified seed in the greenhouse was 16.7% for Tecomseh to 91.7% for La Crescent and Whittaker.
80explicit_cultivar_referenceLa Crescent 91.7 a 91.7 a 16.7 bcde 2.1 2.1
101explicit_cultivar_referenceAverage % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage
107explicit_cultivar_referenceLa Crescent was significantly different than Mount Royal (Table 2).
108explicit_cultivar_referenceAverage % stainability for ‘La Crescent’ decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage (Table 2).
109explicit_cultivar_referenceAverage % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage.
111explicit_cultivar_referenceAfter seven months in storage, % stainability decreased significantly for the plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’, which indicates that relatively short-term (<=6 months) storage of pollen may not result in a significant reduction of viability.
118explicit_cultivar_reference'La Crescent' 1923 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997

Raw Parsed Claims

PageTypeClaimConfidence
14release_year_referenceLa Crescent was introduced in 1923 by the University of Minnesota.0.99
14selection_origin_referenceLa Crescent is part of the University of Minnesota plum hybrid introduction sequence in the 1900s.0.95
14source_reference_abbreviationBrooks and Olmo, 1997 is the source cited for this introduction timeline.0.98
46description_snippetLa Crescent was one of the highest scarified germination performers in greenhouse Experiment Iat 91.7%.0.97
80description_snippetLa Crescent is listed in Table 3 with the value sequence 91.7, 91.7, 16.7 and average weeks 2.1, 2.1, with significance tags shown as a, a, bcde.0.93
80source_reference_abbreviationSignificance annotations on this row include a, a, and bcde labels indicating within-table statistical grouping.0.84
101taxon_contextListed as a plum cultivar evaluated in the winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability and storage study.0.95
101storage_durationAverage pollen stainability decreased significantly after seven months of storage at -20°C.0.95
107description_snippetLa Crescent differed significantly from Mount Royal in pollen stainability.0.94
107source_reference_abbreviationDocumented under Table 2.0.9
108description_snippetThe cultivar’s average stainability declined significantly after ≥7 months of storage.0.97
109entry_hardiness_observationPollen stainability for La Crescent declined significantly after at least seven months of storage.0.97
111storage_durationPollen stainability decreased significantly after approximately 7 months of storage for ‘La Crescent’.0.96
111productivityDespite reduction, viability declines are framed in the context of practical crossing utility rather than absolute sterility.0.63
111description_snippetOne of the plum cultivars evaluated in the study where short-term storage (under 6 months) may not prevent major viability reduction.0.9
118taxon_contextPlum row assigned within the Prunus spp. listing.0.93
118release_year_referenceIntroduction year is listed as 1923.0.93
118selection_origin_referenceSource/reference field cites Brooks and Olmo, 1997.0.95
118entry_locationCollection week is Week 18.0.98

Inherited Context

  • p14: plum | Prunus domestica | plum hybrid introductions | cold-hardy plum hybrid selection | Cold-hardy Prunus breeding programs | Minnesota cultivar release history | Invasive potential | University of Minnesota | Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Fruit Breeding Farm |
  • p46: plum | Prunus | plum cultivars | plum hybrids | Chapter 1 | Experiment I | Plum fruit type | Results | Germination | Minnesota | University of Minnesota
  • p80: Plum (Prunus) trial entries | Prunus species winter-hardiness study | winter-hardy plum cultivars | Plum seed trial comparisons | Table 3 | Table 3: Continued | Plum | University of Minnesota | winter-hardy Prunus species evaluation program | Minnesota, United States
  • p101: Plum cultivar in winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability study | Prunus | Plum grouping used for this storage result | No explicit hybrid designator | Chapter 2 | Summary | University of Minnesota, Department of Horticultural Science | Plant breeding context centered on evalua
  • p107: Prunus cultivar comparison | winter-hardy Prunus cultivars | Table 2 cultivar-level differences | fruit-type grouped pollen assay | Minnesota, US horticultural context
  • p108: Prunus cultivars in pollen stainability analysis | Winter-hardy Prunus species and cultivars | apricot/plum/tart cherry viability comparison | Plum/cherry/apricot cultivar groups | Results carryover from prior table-driven viability comparisons | Discussion | University of
  • p109: Prunus | plum germplasm
  • p111: Prunus plum cultivar | Winter-hardy Prunus taxa | Plum entries evaluated in storage-duration comparison | Plum cultivar subgroup under winter-hardy Prunus pollen studies | Method and results discussion | Conclusions | University of Minnesota, graduate thesis program | Evalu
  • p118: Plum subsection of Table 1 | Prunus spp. | Non-hybrid Prunus spp. entry | No hybrid notation | Table 1 continuation listing fruit type, species, cultivar name, introduction year, collection week, and citation for Prunus cultivars. | University of Minnesota thesis repository

Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to La Crescent (ID 1397) within document 7. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.

Citation focus: cultivar focus: La Crescent (ID 1397) | page focus: 109 | quote focus: Plum 'La Crescent' 91.7 a 91.7 a; 16.7 bcde; 2.1; 2.1.

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

PageTypeQuoteClaimEntityJump
14release_year_referenceThe University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985.La Crescent was introduced in 1923 by the University of Minnesota.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
14selection_origin_referenceThe University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985.La Crescent is part of the University of Minnesota plum hybrid introduction sequence in the 1900s.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
14source_reference_abbreviationThe University of Minnesota introduced a number of plum hybrids throughout the 1900s. For example, La Crescent was introduced in 1923 and Alderman was released in 1985.Brooks and Olmo, 1997 is the source cited for this introduction timeline.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
46description_snippetThe range in average % germination for plum cultivars' scarified seed in the greenhouse was 16.7% for Tecomseh to 91.7% for La Crescent and Whittaker.La Crescent was one of the highest scarified germination performers in greenhouse Experiment Iat 91.7%.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
73entry_locationLa Crescent HRC x - -Collection/source field on this row is HRC.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
73description_snippetLa Crescent HRC x - -The row is captured as 'La Crescent HRC x - -', with limited year/replication values shown beyond the collection source.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
80taxon_contextPlum 'La Crescent' 91.7 a 91.7 a; 16.7 bcde; 2.1; 2.1.Entry is in the Plum subset of Table 3.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
80description_snippetPlum 'La Crescent' 91.7 a 91.7 a; 16.7 bcde; 2.1; 2.1.Table row reports numeric comparison values for this cultivar: non-scarified and scarified entries read 91.7 and 91.7 with paired subsequentcultivar 1397Open Review parse
101storage_durationAverage % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage.Pollen stainability for La Crescent decreased significantly after seven months of storage at -20°C.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
101description_snippetAverage % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage.La Crescent is listed as one of the named plum cultivars showing significant viability decline later in storage.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
107description_snippetwith Superior’ and La Crescent’ was also significantly different than ‘Mount Royal’ (Table 2).La Crescent was significantly different from Mount Royal in the Table 2 pollen stainability comparison.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
108storage_durationAverage % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage whereas 'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2).La Crescent showed significant decreases in pollen stainability after seven or more months of storage.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
109storage_durationAverage % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage.Stainability declined significantly after seven or more months in storage.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
111storage_durationAfter seven months in storage, % stainability decreased significantly for the plums La Crescent, Monitor, and Toka.Pollen of La Crescent showed significant stainability decline after seven months in storage.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
111description_snippetAfter seven months in storage, % stainability decreased significantly for the plums La Crescent, Monitor, and Toka.Page context places La Crescent in the plum subset of the winter-hardy Prunus cultivar set.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
118release_year_reference'La Crescent' 1923 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Introduction year listed as 1923.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
118source_reference_abbreviation'La Crescent' 1923 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Source citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
118entry_location'La Crescent' 1923 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Collection week is shown as Week 18.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
122storage_duration'La Crescent' 82% C-F 77% C 75% BC 80% E-H 84% B-F 77% B-D 79% C-G 68% D-G 53% H 54% H-JLa Crescent is shown at 82%, 77%, 75%, 80%, 84%, 77%, 79%, 68%, 53%, and 54% across months 0 through 9.cultivar 1397Open Review parse
122description_snippet'La Crescent' 82% C-F 77% C 75% BC 80% E-H 84% B-F 77% B-D 79% C-G 68% D-G 53% H 54% H-JMonth-associated group letters are C-F, C, BC, E-H, B-F, B-D, C-G, D-G, H, and H-J.cultivar 1397Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

IDCultivarEvidence / ClaimsRelationshipsHistory / PagesLink
1470Northstar3700Open cultivar
173Moongold3300Open cultivar
143Monitor3100Open cultivar
1419Mount Royal3100Open cultivar
1469Sungold3100Open cultivar
1405South Dakota3000Open cultivar
1471Meteor2900Open cultivar
1403Hazel2800Open cultivar
1487Westcot2700Open cultivar
394Compass2600Open cultivar
1475Whittaker2600Open cultivar
1409Hennepin2500Open cultivar
1490Bali2500Open cultivar
1491Suda2500Open cultivar
1494Gracious2400Open cultivar
1472Alderman2300Open cultivar
140Superior2000Open cultivar
1397La Crescent2000Open cultivar
157Toka1900Open cultivar
1488Debbie'S Gold1800Open cultivar
1493Nbi7551600Open cultivar
1498Winona1600Open cultivar
1499Todd1600Open cultivar
1489Mnzo31400Open cultivar
142Underwood1300Open cultivar
146Pipestone1200Open cultivar
1474Prunus Americana1200Open cultivar
1473Prunus Serotina1100Open cultivar
1512Mesabi900Open cultivar
1501Prunus Munsoniana 'Whittaker'800Open cultivar
1549Surecrop800Open cultivar
1492Nb7155600Open cultivar
170Montmorency500Open cultivar
1504Prunus Cerasus 'Stevnsbaer Brigitte'500Open cultivar
257Pioneer400Open cultivar
290Redcoat400Open cultivar
1476Prunus Cerasus400Open cultivar
1479Prunus Angustifolia400Open cultivar
1500Prunus Americana 'Hazel'400Open cultivar
1503Prunus Domestica 'Mount Royal'400Open cultivar
1506Prunus Spp400Open cultivar
1509Prunus Spp 'South Dakota'400Open cultivar
1516Mns98400Open cultivar
1484Prunus Armeniaca300Open cultivar
1505Tart Cherry Cultivars300Open cultivar
1508Prunus Spp 'Winona'300Open cultivar
1510Prunus Spp 'Hennepin'300Open cultivar
1513Prunus Nigra 'Bounty'300Open cultivar
1514Prunus Spp 'Alderman'300Open cultivar
1515Prunus Spp 'Gracious'300Open cultivar
1517Apricot 'Moongold'300Open cultivar
1518Apricot 'Sungold'300Open cultivar
1531Plum 'Whittaker'300Open cultivar
1537Plum 'Monitor'300Open cultivar
1538Plum 'South Dakota'300Open cultivar
656Dakota200Open cultivar
1478Prunus Domestica200Open cultivar
1485Prunus Persica Batsch200Open cultivar
1497Tecomseh200Open cultivar
1502Japanese-American Hybrid 'South Dakota'200Open cultivar
1507Prunus Domestica 'Todd'200Open cultivar
1511Prunus Munsoniana200Open cultivar
1519Apricot 'Westcot'200Open cultivar
1520Tart Cherry 'Bali'200Open cultivar
1525Plum 'Hazel'200Open cultivar
1526Plum 'Compass'200Open cultivar
1527Plum 'Mount Royal'200Open cultivar
1528Plum 'Opal'200Open cultivar
1529Plum 'Stanley'200Open cultivar
1530Plum 'Todd'200Open cultivar
1532Plum 'Bounty'200Open cultivar
1533Plum 'Alderman'200Open cultivar
1534Plum 'Gracious'200Open cultivar
1535Prunus Spp 'Monitor'200Open cultivar
1536Prunus Spp 'Pipestone'200Open cultivar
1539Plum 'Hennepin'200Open cultivar
1540Plum 'Pipestone'200Open cultivar
1541Plum 'Winona'200Open cultivar
1548P. Nigra200Open cultivar
1477Prunus Persica100Open cultivar
1480Prunus Cerasifera100Open cultivar
1481Prunus Spinosa100Open cultivar
1482Prunus Virginiana100Open cultivar
1483Prunus Campanulata100Open cultivar
1486Prunus Angustifolia Marsh100Open cultivar
1495Opal100Open cultivar
1496Stanley100Open cultivar
1521Tart Cherry 'Mesabi'100Open cultivar
1522Tart Cherry 'Meteor'100Open cultivar
1523Tart Cherry 'Nbi755'100Open cultivar
1524Tart Cherry 'Suda'100Open cultivar
1542P. Armeniaca100Open cultivar
1543P. Cerasus100Open cultivar
1544P. Americana100Open cultivar
1545P. Besseyi X. Prunus Spp100Open cultivar
1546P. Domestica100Open cultivar
1547P. Munsoniana100Open cultivar
1550Kutahya100Open cultivar
parsed only'Northstar'15071, 85, 87, 90, 95, 97, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Meteor'14071, 85, 87, 90, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Bali'12085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Winona'12074, 81, 84, 92, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Monitor'11073, 84, 92, 98, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Moongold'11085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mount Royal'11030, 71, 79, 97, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Westcot'11085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Alderman'10072, 79, 84, 97, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Gracious'10072, 79, 84, 95, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mesabi'10071, 117, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'South Dakota'10073, 84, 92, 98, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Sungold'10085, 87, 90, 97, 117, 120No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Underwood'10074, 119, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Compass'9071, 79, 95, 97, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Pipestone'9073, 84, 92, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Toka'9073, 119, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Hennepin'8073, 84, 97, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Suda'8071, 85, 95, 97, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Todd'7072, 79, 95, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Nbi755'60117, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Whittaker'6072, 79, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Bounty'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Hazel'5071, 95, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'La Crescent'5073, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Opal'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Pioneer'50117, 120No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Stanley'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Montmorency’5013, 61No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Debbie'S Gold'4085, 87, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Superior'4073, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mns98'3073No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Redcoat'3073No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Cerasus 'Northstar'3030No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Emarginata3059No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Hazel’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Meteor’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Northstar’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Whittaker’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Debbie’S Gold'2090No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Surecrop'20122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. bessyi x P. hortulana 'Compass'2088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. cerasus 'Suda'2088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Avium2059No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Besseyi Prunus Spp2099No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Nigra2099No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus virginiana L2055No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Hennepin’2061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Monitor’2052No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘South Dakota’2061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. americana 'Hazel'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. domestica 'Mount Royal'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. munsoniana 'Whittaker'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus cerasus L1028No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus domestica L1028No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Gracious’1097No staging cultivar page yet

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 0

History events: 24

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

StatusLicenseHolder
unknown

Credibility Records

TierScoreAssessorRationale
tier_188autoAcademic institutional domain

Translation Records

Source LangTarget LangMethodStatusNote
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation IDScoreRiskAssessorRationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

StatusVisibilityReviewerNote
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

TypeValueConfidence
taxon_keywordprunus0.75

Extracted Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
description_snippetFrom public gardens to homeowners, Prunus species provide a multitude of options for ornamental use.0.54
description_snippetavium L.) and tart (P.0.54
ornamental_useornamental use0.56
culinary_usejelly and dried fruit0.56
storage_durationstorage………………………………………………………………………1110.56
storage_durationstorage……………………………………………………………………………………730.56
storage_durationstorage on pollen viability in winter-hardy0.56
selection_origin_referencewestern Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P0.57
selection_origin_referenceEurope to North America to0.57
selection_origin_referenceChina not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al0.57
release_year_reference20150.68
breeding_crossgermination in the field environments of E x periments I or II0.65
breeding_crossgermination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus0.65
breeding_crossGreenhouse environment of E x periment I0.65
breeding_crossenvironments of E x periment I0.65
breeding_crossand cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I0.65
year_reference20040.55
year_reference19960.55
year_reference20130.55
year_reference19930.55
year_reference20010.55
year_reference20080.55
year_reference20120.55
year_reference19940.55
year_reference20110.55
year_reference20150.55
year_reference20140.55
year_reference19260.55
year_reference20090.55
year_reference19410.55
year_reference20160.55