Dashboard Explore Search Sources Source Graph Ingest Rights Review Translations Translation QA Publish Review Publish Export Revisit Campaigns History History Conflicts History Arbitration Review Queue Charts Taxa Taxonomy Tree Cultivars Lineage Lab Climate Breeders Institutions Programs Compare Compare Tray Trait Matrix Names Nurseries Nurseries+Catalogs Catalog Issues Archivist Resolution Contradictions Arbitration About API Docs

Minnesota #1695

Document 7

Title: Minnesota #1695

Source URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/891e96c2-d751-4fea-9f35-51fec97c7043/content

Archive provenance: training-candidate-full-doc-no-ocr

Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 1 | Evidence claims: 400

Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 46

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Minnesota

Publisher: University of Minnesota

Site: University of Minnesota Conservancy

Year:

Page count: 138

Type: dissertation

Metadata source: intake_backfill_v1

Relationship Records

IDRelationSourceTargetSource Doc
No catalog relationships linked to this document.

History Records

IDTypeYearLabel
118year_reference1926Year reference 1926
116year_reference1941Year reference 1941
126year_reference1993Year reference 1993
122year_reference1994Year reference 1994
128year_reference1996Year reference 1996
125year_reference2001Year reference 2001
129year_reference2004Year reference 2004
124year_reference2008Year reference 2008
117year_reference2009Year reference 2009
121year_reference2011Year reference 2011
123year_reference2012Year reference 2012
127year_reference2013Year reference 2013
119year_reference2014Year reference 2014
120year_reference2015Year reference 2015
135release_event2015Release event 2015
115year_reference2016Year reference 2016
130cross_event2016and cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I
131cross_event2016environments of E x periment I
132cross_event2016Greenhouse environment of E x periment I
133cross_event2016germination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus
134cross_event2016germination in the field environments of E x periments I or II
136selection_origin_eventSelection origin China not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al
137selection_origin_eventSelection origin Europe to North America to
138selection_origin_eventSelection origin western Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P

Document Reader

Reviewable cultivar from this document:

This selector is limited to cultivars that already have staging pages. Additional parsed names stay in the linked records table below.

56 additional parsed names from this document do not have staging cultivar pages yet.

Parsed Cultivar Detail

Cultivar: Superior

Pages in document: p46 p80 p101 p107 p108 p109 p111 p112 p118

Entry Snippets

PageBasisSnippet
46explicit_cultivar_referenceWithin the plums Hennepin, Superior, and Winona there were significant differences for % germination between non-scarified and scarified seed (p<0.05; Table 3).
80explicit_cultivar_referenceSuperior 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab* 8.3 cde 0.3 * 3.0 *
101explicit_cultivar_referenceMost Prunus ... ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage
107explicit_cultivar_referenceLa Crescent, and Mount Royal differences were noted with Superior also significantly different than Mount Royal (Table 2).
108explicit_cultivar_reference‘Superior’ had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2).
109explicit_cultivar_reference'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage.
111explicit_cultivar_referenceIn contrast, ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in % stainability after only three months in storage (Table 2).
112explicit_cultivar_reference'Except for the plums ‘Monitor’ and ‘Superior’, all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars’ pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at least nine months.'
118explicit_cultivar_reference'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997

Raw Parsed Claims

PageTypeClaimConfidence
46description_snippetSuperior appears in the explicit plum trio with significant differences between scarified and non-scarified treatments (p<0.05).0.97
80description_snippetSuperior is shown with values 8.3, 75.0, 8.3 and average weeks 0.3, 3.0, with asterisked significance notations (bc*, ab*, etc.).0.9
80source_reference_abbreviationThe row includes asterisked significance labels (bc*, ab*, cde).0.86
101storage_durationPollen stainability showed a significant decrease in as few as three months of storage at -20°C.0.97
101taxon_contextAppears as a named Prunus cultivar included in the same pollen viability comparison as other hardy plums.0.94
107description_snippetSuperior was reported as significantly different than Mount Royal in stainability comparisons.0.89
107source_reference_abbreviationEvidence is tied to Table 2.0.86
108description_snippetThis cultivar showed earlier/steeper viability decline, with significant decreases by ~3 months storage.0.99
109entry_hardiness_observationSuperiors exhibited significant decreases in pollen stainability after just three months of storage.0.99
111storage_duration‘Superior’ pollen stainability showed a significant decrease after only 3 months of storage.0.97
111storage_duration‘Superior’ represents a more storage-sensitive outlier versus other examined cultivars.0.89
112description_snippetSuperior was explicitly identified as one of the two plum cultivars that did not follow the >50% stainability result at experiment end.0.92
118taxon_contextPlum cultivar row in the continued Prunus table.0.93
118release_year_referenceIntroduction year is listed as 1933.0.93
118selection_origin_referenceSource/reference field cites Brooks and Olmo, 1997.0.95
118entry_locationCollection week appears as Week 17 (not Week 18) in this row.0.95

Inherited Context

  • p46: plum | Prunus | plum cultivars | plum hybrids | Chapter 1 | Experiment I | Plum fruit type | Results | Germination | Minnesota | University of Minnesota
  • p80: Plum (Prunus) trial entries | Prunus species winter-hardiness study | winter-hardy plum cultivars | Plum seed trial comparisons | Table 3 | Table 3: Continued | Plum | University of Minnesota | winter-hardy Prunus species evaluation program | Minnesota, United States
  • p101: Plum cultivar in winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability and storage study | Prunus | Plum comparison group | No explicit hybrid designator | Chapter 2 | Summary | University of Minnesota, Department of Horticultural Science | Plant breeding context centered on evaluating hard
  • p107: Prunus cultivar comparison | winter-hardy Prunus cultivars | Table 2 | fruit-type pollen stainability test | Minnesota, US horticultural context
  • p108: Prunus cultivars in pollen stainability analysis | Winter-hardy Prunus species and cultivars | apricot/plum/tart cherry viability comparison | Plum/cherry/apricot cultivar groups | Results carryover from prior table-driven viability comparisons | Discussion | University of
  • p109: Prunus | plum germplasm
  • p111: Prunus plum cultivar (explicitly grouped with plum taxa in this sentence) | Winter-hardy Prunus taxa | Plum entries evaluated with 3-month and 7-month comparisons | Plum cultivar subgroup under pollen storage evaluation | Method and results discussion | Conclusions | Univer
  • p112: Prunus | winter-hardy Prunus cultivars | winter-hardy Prunus | University of Minnesota | University of Minnesota Prunus germplasm/crossing context | Minnesota
  • p118: Plum subsection of Table 1 | Prunus spp. | Non-hybrid Prunus spp. entry | No hybrid notation | Table 1 continuation listing fruit type, species, cultivar name, introduction year, collection week, and citation for Prunus cultivars. | University of Minnesota thesis repository

Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to Superior (ID 140) within document 7. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.

Citation focus: cultivar focus: Superior (ID 140) | page focus: 46 | quote focus: 'Superior' 86% B-F 78% C 78% BC 72% H 62% G 66% CD 56% H 53% G 56% H 49% J

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

PageTypeQuoteClaimEntityJump
46description_snippetWithin the plums Hennepin, Superior, and Winona there were significant differences for % germination between non-scarified and scarified seed (p<0.05; Table 3).Superior appears in the explicit plum trio with significant differences between scarified and non-scarified treatments (p<0.05).cultivar 140Open Review parse
73entry_locationSuperior HRC x - -Collection/source field on this row is HRC.cultivar 140Open Review parse
73description_snippetSuperior HRC x - -The row is captured as 'Superior HRC x - -'.cultivar 140Open Review parse
80taxon_contextPlum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *.Plum row in Table 3 continuation.cultivar 140Open Review parse
80description_snippetPlum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *.Row records 8.3 and 75.0 with asterisked significance, plus 8.3 and values 0.3, 3.0 with asterisks.cultivar 140Open Review parse
80source_reference_abbreviationPlum 'Superior' 8.3 bc* 75.0 ab*; 8.3 cde; 0.3 * 3.0 *.Asterisked values appear in-table and likely indicate statistical significance in this dataset.cultivar 140Open Review parse
101storage_durationAverage % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage.Pollen stainability for Superior declined significantly after as few as three months of storage at -20°C.cultivar 140Open Review parse
101description_snippetAverage % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage.Superior is the named cultivar with earlier significant pollen viability reduction relative to the seven-month decline timing of other namedcultivar 140Open Review parse
107description_snippetwith Superior’ and La Crescent’ was also significantly different than ‘Mount Royal’ (Table 2).Superior was significantly different than Mount Royal for pollen stainability in Table 2.cultivar 140Open Review parse
108storage_durationAverage % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage whereas 'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2).Superior had significant decreases in pollen stainability after only three months of storage.cultivar 140Open Review parse
109storage_duration'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2).Significant decrease in pollen stainability after only three months in storage.cultivar 140Open Review parse
111storage_durationIn contrast, Superior had a significant decrease in % stainability after only three months in storage.Superior showed significant pollen stainability decline after only three months in storage.cultivar 140Open Review parse
111description_snippetIn contrast, Superior had a significant decrease in % stainability after only three months in storage.Compared with other tested plum entries, Superior declines earlier under storage in this study.cultivar 140Open Review parse
112description_snippetExcept for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at leSuperior is a plum cultivar named in the same pollen stainability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not stay above 50 pecultivar 140Open Review parse
112entry_hardiness_observationExcept for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at leSuperior appears to have lower retained pollen stainability relative to the majority group after nine months of storage.cultivar 140Open Review parse
112source_reference_abbreviationExcept for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at lePrimary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and cultivar 140Open Review parse
118release_year_reference'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Introduction year listed as 1933.cultivar 140Open Review parse
118source_reference_abbreviation'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Source citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997.cultivar 140Open Review parse
118entry_location'Superior' 1933 Week 17 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Collection week is shown as Week 17.cultivar 140Open Review parse
123storage_duration'Superior' 86% B-F 78% C 78% BC 72% H 62% G 66% CD 56% H 53% G 56% H 49% JFor 'Superior' in Table 2: Initial (0 months) 86% (B-F), 1 month 78% (C), 2 months 78% (BC), 3 months 72% (H), 4 months 62% (G), 5 months 66cultivar 140Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

IDCultivarEvidence / ClaimsRelationshipsHistory / PagesLink
1470Northstar3700Open cultivar
173Moongold3300Open cultivar
143Monitor3100Open cultivar
1419Mount Royal3100Open cultivar
1469Sungold3100Open cultivar
1405South Dakota3000Open cultivar
1471Meteor2900Open cultivar
1403Hazel2800Open cultivar
1487Westcot2700Open cultivar
394Compass2600Open cultivar
1475Whittaker2600Open cultivar
1409Hennepin2500Open cultivar
1490Bali2500Open cultivar
1491Suda2500Open cultivar
1494Gracious2400Open cultivar
1472Alderman2300Open cultivar
140Superior2000Open cultivar
1397La Crescent2000Open cultivar
157Toka1900Open cultivar
1488Debbie'S Gold1800Open cultivar
1493Nbi7551600Open cultivar
1498Winona1600Open cultivar
1499Todd1600Open cultivar
1489Mnzo31400Open cultivar
142Underwood1300Open cultivar
146Pipestone1200Open cultivar
1474Prunus Americana1200Open cultivar
1473Prunus Serotina1100Open cultivar
1512Mesabi900Open cultivar
1501Prunus Munsoniana 'Whittaker'800Open cultivar
1549Surecrop800Open cultivar
1492Nb7155600Open cultivar
170Montmorency500Open cultivar
1504Prunus Cerasus 'Stevnsbaer Brigitte'500Open cultivar
257Pioneer400Open cultivar
290Redcoat400Open cultivar
1476Prunus Cerasus400Open cultivar
1479Prunus Angustifolia400Open cultivar
1500Prunus Americana 'Hazel'400Open cultivar
1503Prunus Domestica 'Mount Royal'400Open cultivar
1506Prunus Spp400Open cultivar
1509Prunus Spp 'South Dakota'400Open cultivar
1516Mns98400Open cultivar
1484Prunus Armeniaca300Open cultivar
1505Tart Cherry Cultivars300Open cultivar
1508Prunus Spp 'Winona'300Open cultivar
1510Prunus Spp 'Hennepin'300Open cultivar
1513Prunus Nigra 'Bounty'300Open cultivar
1514Prunus Spp 'Alderman'300Open cultivar
1515Prunus Spp 'Gracious'300Open cultivar
1517Apricot 'Moongold'300Open cultivar
1518Apricot 'Sungold'300Open cultivar
1531Plum 'Whittaker'300Open cultivar
1537Plum 'Monitor'300Open cultivar
1538Plum 'South Dakota'300Open cultivar
656Dakota200Open cultivar
1478Prunus Domestica200Open cultivar
1485Prunus Persica Batsch200Open cultivar
1497Tecomseh200Open cultivar
1502Japanese-American Hybrid 'South Dakota'200Open cultivar
1507Prunus Domestica 'Todd'200Open cultivar
1511Prunus Munsoniana200Open cultivar
1519Apricot 'Westcot'200Open cultivar
1520Tart Cherry 'Bali'200Open cultivar
1525Plum 'Hazel'200Open cultivar
1526Plum 'Compass'200Open cultivar
1527Plum 'Mount Royal'200Open cultivar
1528Plum 'Opal'200Open cultivar
1529Plum 'Stanley'200Open cultivar
1530Plum 'Todd'200Open cultivar
1532Plum 'Bounty'200Open cultivar
1533Plum 'Alderman'200Open cultivar
1534Plum 'Gracious'200Open cultivar
1535Prunus Spp 'Monitor'200Open cultivar
1536Prunus Spp 'Pipestone'200Open cultivar
1539Plum 'Hennepin'200Open cultivar
1540Plum 'Pipestone'200Open cultivar
1541Plum 'Winona'200Open cultivar
1548P. Nigra200Open cultivar
1477Prunus Persica100Open cultivar
1480Prunus Cerasifera100Open cultivar
1481Prunus Spinosa100Open cultivar
1482Prunus Virginiana100Open cultivar
1483Prunus Campanulata100Open cultivar
1486Prunus Angustifolia Marsh100Open cultivar
1495Opal100Open cultivar
1496Stanley100Open cultivar
1521Tart Cherry 'Mesabi'100Open cultivar
1522Tart Cherry 'Meteor'100Open cultivar
1523Tart Cherry 'Nbi755'100Open cultivar
1524Tart Cherry 'Suda'100Open cultivar
1542P. Armeniaca100Open cultivar
1543P. Cerasus100Open cultivar
1544P. Americana100Open cultivar
1545P. Besseyi X. Prunus Spp100Open cultivar
1546P. Domestica100Open cultivar
1547P. Munsoniana100Open cultivar
1550Kutahya100Open cultivar
parsed only'Northstar'15071, 85, 87, 90, 95, 97, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Meteor'14071, 85, 87, 90, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Bali'12085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Winona'12074, 81, 84, 92, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Monitor'11073, 84, 92, 98, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Moongold'11085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mount Royal'11030, 71, 79, 97, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Westcot'11085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Alderman'10072, 79, 84, 97, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Gracious'10072, 79, 84, 95, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mesabi'10071, 117, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'South Dakota'10073, 84, 92, 98, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Sungold'10085, 87, 90, 97, 117, 120No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Underwood'10074, 119, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Compass'9071, 79, 95, 97, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Pipestone'9073, 84, 92, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Toka'9073, 119, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Hennepin'8073, 84, 97, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Suda'8071, 85, 95, 97, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Todd'7072, 79, 95, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Nbi755'60117, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Whittaker'6072, 79, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Bounty'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Hazel'5071, 95, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'La Crescent'5073, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Opal'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Pioneer'50117, 120No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Stanley'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Montmorency’5013, 61No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Debbie'S Gold'4085, 87, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Superior'4073, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mns98'3073No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Redcoat'3073No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Cerasus 'Northstar'3030No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Emarginata3059No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Hazel’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Meteor’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Northstar’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Whittaker’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Debbie’S Gold'2090No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Surecrop'20122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. bessyi x P. hortulana 'Compass'2088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. cerasus 'Suda'2088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Avium2059No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Besseyi Prunus Spp2099No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Nigra2099No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus virginiana L2055No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Hennepin’2061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Monitor’2052No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘South Dakota’2061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. americana 'Hazel'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. domestica 'Mount Royal'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. munsoniana 'Whittaker'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus cerasus L1028No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus domestica L1028No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Gracious’1097No staging cultivar page yet

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 0

History events: 24

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

StatusLicenseHolder
unknown

Credibility Records

TierScoreAssessorRationale
tier_188autoAcademic institutional domain

Translation Records

Source LangTarget LangMethodStatusNote
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation IDScoreRiskAssessorRationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

StatusVisibilityReviewerNote
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

TypeValueConfidence
taxon_keywordprunus0.75

Extracted Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
description_snippetFrom public gardens to homeowners, Prunus species provide a multitude of options for ornamental use.0.54
description_snippetavium L.) and tart (P.0.54
ornamental_useornamental use0.56
culinary_usejelly and dried fruit0.56
storage_durationstorage………………………………………………………………………1110.56
storage_durationstorage……………………………………………………………………………………730.56
storage_durationstorage on pollen viability in winter-hardy0.56
selection_origin_referencewestern Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P0.57
selection_origin_referenceEurope to North America to0.57
selection_origin_referenceChina not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al0.57
release_year_reference20150.68
breeding_crossgermination in the field environments of E x periments I or II0.65
breeding_crossgermination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus0.65
breeding_crossGreenhouse environment of E x periment I0.65
breeding_crossenvironments of E x periment I0.65
breeding_crossand cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I0.65
year_reference20040.55
year_reference19960.55
year_reference20130.55
year_reference19930.55
year_reference20010.55
year_reference20080.55
year_reference20120.55
year_reference19940.55
year_reference20110.55
year_reference20150.55
year_reference20140.55
year_reference19260.55
year_reference20090.55
year_reference19410.55
year_reference20160.55