Minnesota #1695

Document 7

Title: Minnesota #1695

Source URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/891e96c2-d751-4fea-9f35-51fec97c7043/content

Archive provenance: training-candidate-full-doc-no-ocr

Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 1 | Evidence claims: 400

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Minnesota

Publisher: University of Minnesota

Site: University of Minnesota Conservancy

Year:

Page count: 138

Type: dissertation

Metadata source: intake_backfill_v1

Relationship Records

IDRelationSourceTargetSource Doc
No catalog relationships linked to this document.

History Records

IDTypeYearLabel
118year_reference1926Year reference 1926
116year_reference1941Year reference 1941
126year_reference1993Year reference 1993
122year_reference1994Year reference 1994
128year_reference1996Year reference 1996
125year_reference2001Year reference 2001
129year_reference2004Year reference 2004
124year_reference2008Year reference 2008
117year_reference2009Year reference 2009
121year_reference2011Year reference 2011
123year_reference2012Year reference 2012
127year_reference2013Year reference 2013
119year_reference2014Year reference 2014
120year_reference2015Year reference 2015
135release_event2015Release event 2015
115year_reference2016Year reference 2016
130cross_event2016and cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I
131cross_event2016environments of E x periment I
132cross_event2016Greenhouse environment of E x periment I
133cross_event2016germination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus
134cross_event2016germination in the field environments of E x periments I or II
136selection_origin_eventSelection origin China not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al
137selection_origin_eventSelection origin Europe to North America to
138selection_origin_eventSelection origin western Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P

Document Reader

Reviewable cultivar from this document:

This selector is limited to cultivars that already have staging pages. Additional parsed names stay in the linked records table below.

56 additional parsed names from this document do not have staging cultivar pages yet.

Parsed Cultivar Detail

Cultivar: Mount Royal

Pages in document: p46 p47 p48 p49 p50 p83 p91 p93 p106 p107 p108 p109 p118

Entry Snippets

PageBasisSnippet
46explicit_cultivar_referenceAverage germination percentages ranged from 0.0% for Mount Royal, Stanley, and Tecomseh to 62.5% for Hennepin ...
47explicit_cultivar_referenceFor seed stored for 25 months, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Monitor', 'Mount Royal' and 'Pipestone' to 95.8% for 'Hennepin' (Table 5).
48explicit_cultivar_referenceField initial heights ranged from 8.5 cm for seedlings from 'Mount Royal' to 25.7 cm for seedlings from 'Whittaker'; greenhouse initial stem diameters ranged up to 6.88 mm for seedlings from 'Mount Royal'.
49explicit_cultivar_referenceFor plum seedlings started in the field, cultivar had a significant effect on ATCA (p<0.001) with average ATCA ranging from 3.18 mm2 for seedlings from 'Mount Royal' to 36.89 mm2 for seedlings from 'Whittaker' (Table 7).
50explicit_cultivar_referenceAt the end of Experiment III, % survival among plum seedlings started in the greenhouse ranged from 33% for seedlings from Pipestone to 89% for seedlings from Mount Royal (Table 10).
83explicit_cultivar_referencePlum 'Mount Royal' 16.7 cde 29.2 1.8 1.2
91explicit_cultivar_referencePlum, P. domestica, Mount Royal, 8.5 d, 1.90 ab, 0.83 b, 3.18 b
93explicit_cultivar_referencePlum P. domestica 'Mount Royal' 4.5 ab
106explicit_cultivar_referenceInitial % stainability for plums ranged from 81% for 'Toka' to 98% for 'Mount Royal' with significant variation.
107explicit_cultivar_referenceThere was some significant but inconsistent variation within Mount Royal and Gracious; La Crescent and Superior were also significantly different than Mount Royal (Table 2).
108explicit_cultivar_referenceThere was some significant but inconsistent variation within ‘Mount Royal’ (Table 2).
109explicit_cultivar_referenceThere was some significant but inconsistent variation within 'Mount Royal' and 'Gracious' (Table 2); 'P. domestica' 'Mount Royal' had high initial % stainability.
118explicit_cultivar_referenceP. domestica L. 'Mount Royal' ~1900 Week 18 Andersen and Weir, 1967

Raw Parsed Claims

PageTypeClaimConfidence
46description_snippetField Experiment Iincluded Mount Royal in the lowest-average set at 0.0% germination.0.98
47entry_hardiness_observationIn 25-month seed-storage conditions, 'Mount Royal' is listed among the lowest observed average germination values at 4.2% (Table 5).0.9
48description_snippetMount Royal had one of the lowest reported field initial heights (8.5 cm), while also showing the highest greenhouse initial stem diameter value (6.88 mm) in the same cultivar comparison set.0.93
49description_snippetMount Royal is the low end of field ATCA among sampled plum cultivars (3.18 mm2), indicating lower average ATCA relative to Whittaker (36.89 mm2).0.93
50description_snippetGreenhouse survival at the end of Experiment III was reported as 89% for Mount Royal seedlings (Table 10).0.96
83description_snippetPlum cultivar 'Mount Royal' has non-scarified germination of 16.7% and scarified germination of 29.2% with cde mean-separation notation.0.97
83description_snippetFor 'Mount Royal', average germination time is 1.8 weeks non-scarified and 1.2 weeks scarified.0.97
91taxon_contextPlum entry identified as Prunus domestica cultivar Mount Royal.0.97
91description_snippetField replication measurements for Mount Royal: initial height 8.5 d cm, initial stem diameter 1.90 ab mm, change in stem diameter 0.83 b mm, DeltaTCA 3.18 b mm2.0.94
93taxon_contextPlum entry under P. domestica.0.99
93description_snippetAverage herbivore damage rating in Experiment III (pooled over germination environments) is 4.5; Tukey grouping includes 'ab'.0.99
106description_snippetInitial pollen stainability for plum cultivar 'Mount Royal' was 98%.0.97
107description_snippetMount Royal showed significant but inconsistent variation signals in the cited cultivar comparison.0.92
107description_snippetMount Royal was significantly different from La Crescent and Superior in pollen stainability.0.94
107source_reference_abbreviationThese comparisons are reported in Table 2.0.9
108description_snippetThis cultivar showed some significant but inconsistent variation in % stainability across months in storage in Table 2.0.95
109description_snippetMount Royal had significant but inconsistent variation in Table 2 comparisons.0.96
109description_snippetMount Royal had high initial pollen stainability.0.95
109description_snippetMount Royal has remained above 50% stainability and is described as an older cultivar still showing potential male fertility.0.86
118taxon_contextSpecies field identifies this as Prunus domestica L.0.97
118release_year_referenceIntroduction year is reported as approximately 1900.0.93
118selection_origin_referenceSource/reference field cites Andersen and Weir, 1967.0.95
118entry_locationCollection week is Week 18.0.98

Inherited Context

  • p46: plum | Prunus | plum cultivars | plum hybrids | Chapter 1 | Experiment I | Plum fruit type | Results | Germination | Minnesota | University of Minnesota
  • p47: Prunus: plum | winter-hardy Prunus | Experiment II plum cultivar subset | plum cultivar comparisons | Results | Experiment II | Plum | % germination and time to germination | University of Minnesota graduate thesis research setting | Germplasm evaluation for winter-hardy Pru
  • p48: plum cultivar trial | Prunus spp. | Table 6/7 comparison context | plum cultivar performance cohort | Background on seed-cultivar experiments in winter-hardiness trials | Experiment III (plum seedling growth and establishment comparisons) | References to Table 5, Table 6, Ta
  • p49: Prunus spp. | plum | plum cultivars | Prunus species thesis | Experiment III | Plum cultivar results | University of Minnesota | Winter-hardy Prunus evaluation research context | University of Minnesota thesis context (temperate field/greenhouse trials)
  • p50: Prunus | plum | plum entries | Prunus spp. hybrids | Results | Experiment III | Correlations and summary | Minnesota | United States
  • p83: Plum (Prunus) | Prunus | Table 4 cultivar entries under greenhouse Experiment II | Winter-hardy Prunus cultivar trial | Table 4 | Greenhouse Environment | Experiment II | Table continued page | University of Minnesota graduate thesis | Evaluation of seed handling and dormanc
  • p91: Table 7 female-parent field replication, plum section | Prunus | Plum species entries in Prunus trial table | winter-hardy Prunus cultivar performance | Table 7: Continued | Female Parent Field Replication | Continuation of Prunus table from previous page | University of Min
  • p93: Fruit type: Plum | Species: Prunus domestica | Prunus | Plum cultivar entry | Winter-hardiness cultivar trial | A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species | Table 8 | Average herbivore damage rating | Experiment III | University of Minnesota | Graduate thesis work | University
  • p106: Prunus—plum subset | winter-hardy Prunus species evaluation | Methods and results narrative for pollen stainability experiment | Statistics and interpretation for cultivar-level comparisons | Minnesota (University of Minnesota, Excelsior, MN)
  • p107: Prunus cultivar comparison | winter-hardy Prunus cultivars | Table 2 variation statements | prunus fruit-type comparison | Minnesota, US horticultural context
  • p108: Prunus cultivars in pollen stainability analysis | Winter-hardy Prunus species and cultivars | apricot/plum/tart cherry viability comparison | Plum/cherry/apricot cultivar groups | Results carryover from prior table-driven viability comparisons | Discussion | University of
  • p109: Prunus | Prunus domestica | hybrid plums | plum germplasm
  • p118: Plum subsection of Table 1 | Prunus domestica and other Prunus spp. entries | Non-hybrid plum entry | No interspecific hybrid notation in this row | Table 1 continuation listing fruit type, species, cultivar name, introduction year, collection week, and citation for Prunus

Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to Mount Royal (ID 1419) within document 7. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.

Citation focus: cultivar focus: Mount Royal (ID 1419) | page focus: 106 | quote focus: Plum 'Mount Royal' 89 100

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

PageTypeQuoteClaimEntityJump
46description_snippetAverage germination percentages ranged from 0.0% for Mount Royal, Stanley, and Tecomseh to 62.5% for Hennepin ...Field Experiment Iincluded Mount Royal in the lowest-average set at 0.0% germination.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
47entry_hardiness_observationFor seed stored for 25 months, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Monitor', 'Mount Royal' and 'Pipestone' to 95.8% for 'Hennepin' (Table 5).In 25-month seed-storage conditions, 'Mount Royal' is listed among the lowest observed average germination values at 4.2% (Table 5).cultivar 1419Open Review parse
48description_snippetAverage initial heights of plum seedlings started in the field ranged from 8.5 cm for seedlings from 'Mount Royal' to 25.7 cm for seedlings from 'Whittaker' (Table 7). ... average initial diameters ranged from 4.21 mm foMount Royal is the minimum field initial height value in the cited range (8.5 cm), referenced in Table 7 for Experiment III.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
49description_snippetFor plum seedlings started in the field, cultivar had a significant effect on ATCA (p<0.001) with average ATCA ranging from 3.18 mm2 for seedlings from 'Mount Royal' to 36.89 mm2 for seedlings from 'Whittaker' (Table 7).Mount Royal is the low end of field ATCA among sampled plum cultivars (3.18 mm2), indicating lower average ATCA relative to Whittaker (36.89cultivar 1419Open Review parse
50description_snippetAt the end of Experiment III, % survival among plum seedlings started in the greenhouse ranged from 33% for seedlings from Pipestone to 89% for seedlings from Mount Royal (Table 10).Greenhouse survival at the end of Experiment III was reported as 89% for Mount Royal seedlings (Table 10).cultivar 1419Open Review parse
71selection_origin_referenceP. domestica L. ‘Mount Royal' HRC & UMN x x 7 5Collection locations are listed as HRC and UMN.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
71description_snippetP. domestica L. ‘Mount Royal' HRC & UMN x x 7 5Seed-year year columns show x values, with greenhouse/field replications of 7 and 5.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
83description_snippetPlum 'Mount Royal' 16.7 cde 29.2 1.8 1.2Plum 'Mount Royal' records 16.7% non-scarified and 29.2% scarified germination, with average weeks 1.8 and 1.2.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
86storage_durationTable 5: Continued ... 'Mount Royal' 4.2 d 16.7 abPlum 'Mount Royal' field germination was 4.2% at 25 months and 16.7% at 1 month (Table 5).cultivar 1419Open Review parse
86description_snippetTable 5: Continued ... 'Mount Royal' 4.2 d 16.7 abIncluded as a plum cultivar entry in Table 5 (continued).cultivar 1419Open Review parse
88description_snippetP. domestica ‘Mount Royal’ 60.7 ab 6.88 a 1.33 9.69Prunus domestica 'Mount Royal' has greenhouse values of 60.7 ab, 6.88 a, 1.33, and 9.69 for the listed replication parameters.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
88source_reference_abbreviationP. domestica ‘Mount Royal’ 60.7 ab 6.88 a 1.33 9.69Part of Table 6 female-parent greenhouse replication continuation.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
91taxon_contextP. domestica 'Mount Royal' 8.5 d 1.90 ab 0.83 b 3.18 bCultivar listed as plum, Prunus domestica 'Mount Royal'.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
91description_snippetP. domestica 'Mount Royal' 8.5 d 1.90 ab 0.83 b 3.18 bTable values indicate initial height 8.5 cm, initial stem diameter 1.90 mm, change in stem diameter 0.83 mm, and ΔTCA 3.18 mm².cultivar 1419Open Review parse
93taxon_contextPlum ... P. domestica 'Mount Royal' 4.5 abListed in the Plum section as Prunus domestica 'Mount Royal'.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
93description_snippetPlum ... P. domestica 'Mount Royal' 4.5 abHerbivore rating reported as 4.5 (Tukey grouping marker ab).cultivar 1419Open Review parse
97entry_hardiness_observationPlum 'Mount Royal' 89 100For 'Mount Royal', percent survival was 89 in greenhouse (Grhs.) and 100 in field at the end of Experiment III.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
106description_snippetInitial % stainability for plums ranged from 81% for 'Toka' to 98% for 'Mount Royal' with significant...Mount Royal had initial pollen stainability of 98% in the plum cultivar set.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
107description_snippetToka differed significantly from South Dakota followed by Mount Royal with Superior’ and La Crescent’ was also significantly different than Mount Royal (Table 2).Mount Royal was included in the set where Superior and La Crescent were reported as significantly different from it.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
108entry_hardiness_observationThere was some significant but inconsistent variation within 'Mount Royal' and 'Gracious' (Table 2).There was some significant but inconsistent variation within Mount Royal in Table 2 pollen stainability data.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
109description_snippetP. domestica 'Mount Royal' had high % stainability. Even though 'Compass', 'Mount Royal', and 'Suda' have been around for more than a century, % stainability was >50% throughout this experiment.'Mount Royal' showed high pollen stainability.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
109release_year_referenceP. domestica 'Mount Royal' had high % stainability. Even though 'Compass', 'Mount Royal', and 'Suda' have been around for more than a century, % stainability was >50% throughout this experiment.Cultivar has been present for more than a century according to page context.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
109entry_hardiness_observationP. domestica 'Mount Royal' had high % stainability. Even though 'Compass', 'Mount Royal', and 'Suda' have been around for more than a century, % stainability was >50% throughout this experiment.Maintained >50% pollen stainability throughout the experiment.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
109recommendation_contextP. domestica 'Mount Royal' had high % stainability. Even though 'Compass', 'Mount Royal', and 'Suda' have been around for more than a century, % stainability was >50% throughout this experiment.High stainability implies potential usefulness in breeding crosses.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
118entry_pedigreeP. domestica L. 'Mount Royal' ~1900 Week 18 Andersen and Weir, 1967Species context is P. domestica L.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
118release_year_referenceP. domestica L. 'Mount Royal' ~1900 Week 18 Andersen and Weir, 1967Introduction year is approximately 1900 (~1900).cultivar 1419Open Review parse
118source_reference_abbreviationP. domestica L. 'Mount Royal' ~1900 Week 18 Andersen and Weir, 1967Source citation given as Andersen and Weir, 1967.cultivar 1419Open Review parse
123storage_duration'Mount Royal' 98% A 94% A-C 98% A 93% B-F 88% A-F 90% AB 92% A-D 93% A-C 93% A-D 91% A-DFor 'Mount Royal' in Table 2: Initial (0 months) 98% (A), 1 month 94% (A-C), 2 months 98% (A), 3 months 93% (B-F), 4 months 88% (A-F), 5 moncultivar 1419Open Review parse
123description_snippet'Mount Royal' 98% A 94% A-C 98% A 93% B-F 88% A-F 90% AB 92% A-D 93% A-C 93% A-D 91% A-DThis row is formatted as a sequence of percentage values paired with letter-class annotations used across the table, matching the Table 2 stcultivar 1419Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

IDCultivarEvidence / ClaimsRelationshipsHistory / PagesLink
1470Northstar3700Open cultivar
173Moongold3300Open cultivar
143Monitor3100Open cultivar
1419Mount Royal3100Open cultivar
1469Sungold3100Open cultivar
1405South Dakota3000Open cultivar
1471Meteor2900Open cultivar
1403Hazel2800Open cultivar
1487Westcot2700Open cultivar
394Compass2600Open cultivar
1475Whittaker2600Open cultivar
1409Hennepin2500Open cultivar
1490Bali2500Open cultivar
1491Suda2500Open cultivar
1494Gracious2400Open cultivar
1472Alderman2300Open cultivar
140Superior2000Open cultivar
1397La Crescent2000Open cultivar
157Toka1900Open cultivar
1488Debbie'S Gold1800Open cultivar
1493Nbi7551600Open cultivar
1498Winona1600Open cultivar
1499Todd1600Open cultivar
1489Mnzo31400Open cultivar
142Underwood1300Open cultivar
146Pipestone1200Open cultivar
1474Prunus Americana1200Open cultivar
1473Prunus Serotina1100Open cultivar
1512Mesabi900Open cultivar
1501Prunus Munsoniana 'Whittaker'800Open cultivar
1549Surecrop800Open cultivar
1492Nb7155600Open cultivar
170Montmorency500Open cultivar
1504Prunus Cerasus 'Stevnsbaer Brigitte'500Open cultivar
257Pioneer400Open cultivar
290Redcoat400Open cultivar
1476Prunus Cerasus400Open cultivar
1479Prunus Angustifolia400Open cultivar
1500Prunus Americana 'Hazel'400Open cultivar
1503Prunus Domestica 'Mount Royal'400Open cultivar
1506Prunus Spp400Open cultivar
1509Prunus Spp 'South Dakota'400Open cultivar
1516Mns98400Open cultivar
1484Prunus Armeniaca300Open cultivar
1505Tart Cherry Cultivars300Open cultivar
1508Prunus Spp 'Winona'300Open cultivar
1510Prunus Spp 'Hennepin'300Open cultivar
1513Prunus Nigra 'Bounty'300Open cultivar
1514Prunus Spp 'Alderman'300Open cultivar
1515Prunus Spp 'Gracious'300Open cultivar
1517Apricot 'Moongold'300Open cultivar
1518Apricot 'Sungold'300Open cultivar
1531Plum 'Whittaker'300Open cultivar
1537Plum 'Monitor'300Open cultivar
1538Plum 'South Dakota'300Open cultivar
656Dakota200Open cultivar
1478Prunus Domestica200Open cultivar
1485Prunus Persica Batsch200Open cultivar
1497Tecomseh200Open cultivar
1502Japanese-American Hybrid 'South Dakota'200Open cultivar
1507Prunus Domestica 'Todd'200Open cultivar
1511Prunus Munsoniana200Open cultivar
1519Apricot 'Westcot'200Open cultivar
1520Tart Cherry 'Bali'200Open cultivar
1525Plum 'Hazel'200Open cultivar
1526Plum 'Compass'200Open cultivar
1527Plum 'Mount Royal'200Open cultivar
1528Plum 'Opal'200Open cultivar
1529Plum 'Stanley'200Open cultivar
1530Plum 'Todd'200Open cultivar
1532Plum 'Bounty'200Open cultivar
1533Plum 'Alderman'200Open cultivar
1534Plum 'Gracious'200Open cultivar
1535Prunus Spp 'Monitor'200Open cultivar
1536Prunus Spp 'Pipestone'200Open cultivar
1539Plum 'Hennepin'200Open cultivar
1540Plum 'Pipestone'200Open cultivar
1541Plum 'Winona'200Open cultivar
1548P. Nigra200Open cultivar
1477Prunus Persica100Open cultivar
1480Prunus Cerasifera100Open cultivar
1481Prunus Spinosa100Open cultivar
1482Prunus Virginiana100Open cultivar
1483Prunus Campanulata100Open cultivar
1486Prunus Angustifolia Marsh100Open cultivar
1495Opal100Open cultivar
1496Stanley100Open cultivar
1521Tart Cherry 'Mesabi'100Open cultivar
1522Tart Cherry 'Meteor'100Open cultivar
1523Tart Cherry 'Nbi755'100Open cultivar
1524Tart Cherry 'Suda'100Open cultivar
1542P. Armeniaca100Open cultivar
1543P. Cerasus100Open cultivar
1544P. Americana100Open cultivar
1545P. Besseyi X. Prunus Spp100Open cultivar
1546P. Domestica100Open cultivar
1547P. Munsoniana100Open cultivar
1550Kutahya100Open cultivar
parsed only'Northstar'15071, 85, 87, 90, 95, 97, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Meteor'14071, 85, 87, 90, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Bali'12085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Winona'12074, 81, 84, 92, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Monitor'11073, 84, 92, 98, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Moongold'11085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mount Royal'11030, 71, 79, 97, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Westcot'11085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Alderman'10072, 79, 84, 97, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Gracious'10072, 79, 84, 95, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mesabi'10071, 117, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'South Dakota'10073, 84, 92, 98, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Sungold'10085, 87, 90, 97, 117, 120No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Underwood'10074, 119, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Compass'9071, 79, 95, 97, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Pipestone'9073, 84, 92, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Toka'9073, 119, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Hennepin'8073, 84, 97, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Suda'8071, 85, 95, 97, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Todd'7072, 79, 95, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Nbi755'60117, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Whittaker'6072, 79, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Bounty'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Hazel'5071, 95, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'La Crescent'5073, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Opal'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Pioneer'50117, 120No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Stanley'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Montmorency’5013, 61No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Debbie'S Gold'4085, 87, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Superior'4073, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mns98'3073No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Redcoat'3073No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Cerasus 'Northstar'3030No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Emarginata3059No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Hazel’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Meteor’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Northstar’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Whittaker’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Debbie’S Gold'2090No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Surecrop'20122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. bessyi x P. hortulana 'Compass'2088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. cerasus 'Suda'2088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Avium2059No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Besseyi Prunus Spp2099No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Nigra2099No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus virginiana L2055No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Hennepin’2061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Monitor’2052No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘South Dakota’2061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. americana 'Hazel'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. domestica 'Mount Royal'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. munsoniana 'Whittaker'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus cerasus L1028No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus domestica L1028No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Gracious’1097No staging cultivar page yet

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 0

History events: 24

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

StatusLicenseHolder
unknown

Credibility Records

TierScoreAssessorRationale
tier_188autoAcademic institutional domain

Translation Records

Source LangTarget LangMethodStatusNote
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation IDScoreRiskAssessorRationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

StatusVisibilityReviewerNote
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

TypeValueConfidence
taxon_keywordprunus0.75

Extracted Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
description_snippetFrom public gardens to homeowners, Prunus species provide a multitude of options for ornamental use.0.54
description_snippetavium L.) and tart (P.0.54
ornamental_useornamental use0.56
culinary_usejelly and dried fruit0.56
storage_durationstorage………………………………………………………………………1110.56
storage_durationstorage……………………………………………………………………………………730.56
storage_durationstorage on pollen viability in winter-hardy0.56
selection_origin_referencewestern Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P0.57
selection_origin_referenceEurope to North America to0.57
selection_origin_referenceChina not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al0.57
release_year_reference20150.68
breeding_crossgermination in the field environments of E x periments I or II0.65
breeding_crossgermination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus0.65
breeding_crossGreenhouse environment of E x periment I0.65
breeding_crossenvironments of E x periment I0.65
breeding_crossand cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I0.65
year_reference20040.55
year_reference19960.55
year_reference20130.55
year_reference19930.55
year_reference20010.55
year_reference20080.55
year_reference20120.55
year_reference19940.55
year_reference20110.55
year_reference20150.55
year_reference20140.55
year_reference19260.55
year_reference20090.55
year_reference19410.55
year_reference20160.55