Dashboard Explore Search Sources Source Graph Ingest Rights Review Translations Translation QA Publish Review Publish Export Revisit Campaigns History History Conflicts History Arbitration Review Queue Charts Taxa Taxonomy Tree Cultivars Lineage Lab Climate Breeders Institutions Programs Compare Compare Tray Trait Matrix Names Nurseries Nurseries+Catalogs Catalog Issues Archivist Resolution Contradictions Arbitration About API Docs

Minnesota #1695

Document 7

Title: Minnesota #1695

Source URL: https://conservancy.umn.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/891e96c2-d751-4fea-9f35-51fec97c7043/content

Archive provenance: training-candidate-full-doc-no-ocr

Type: pdf | Language: en | Rights: unknown

Aliases: 1 | Provenance events: 1 | Evidence claims: 400

Archivist page review: Review parse variants for page 109

Open profile JSON | Open citation JSON

Document Metadata

Institution: University of Minnesota

Publisher: University of Minnesota

Site: University of Minnesota Conservancy

Year:

Page count: 138

Type: dissertation

Metadata source: intake_backfill_v1

Relationship Records

IDRelationSourceTargetSource Doc
No catalog relationships linked to this document.

History Records

IDTypeYearLabel
118year_reference1926Year reference 1926
116year_reference1941Year reference 1941
126year_reference1993Year reference 1993
122year_reference1994Year reference 1994
128year_reference1996Year reference 1996
125year_reference2001Year reference 2001
129year_reference2004Year reference 2004
124year_reference2008Year reference 2008
117year_reference2009Year reference 2009
121year_reference2011Year reference 2011
123year_reference2012Year reference 2012
127year_reference2013Year reference 2013
119year_reference2014Year reference 2014
120year_reference2015Year reference 2015
135release_event2015Release event 2015
115year_reference2016Year reference 2016
130cross_event2016and cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I
131cross_event2016environments of E x periment I
132cross_event2016Greenhouse environment of E x periment I
133cross_event2016germination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus
134cross_event2016germination in the field environments of E x periments I or II
136selection_origin_eventSelection origin China not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al
137selection_origin_eventSelection origin Europe to North America to
138selection_origin_eventSelection origin western Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P

Document Reader

Reviewable cultivar from this document:

This selector is limited to cultivars that already have staging pages. Additional parsed names stay in the linked records table below.

56 additional parsed names from this document do not have staging cultivar pages yet.

Parsed Cultivar Detail

Cultivar: Monitor

Pages in document: p47 p48 p49 p50 p80 p101 p108 p109 p111 p112 p118

Entry Snippets

PageBasisSnippet
47explicit_cultivar_referenceFor seed stored for 25 months, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Monitor', 'Mount Royal' and 'Pipestone' to 95.8% for 'Hennepin' (Table 5).
48explicit_cultivar_referenceField initial stem diameters ranged from 1.16 mm for seedlings from 'Monitor' to 2.39 mm for seedlings from 'Todd'.
49explicit_cultivar_reference... from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', 'South Dakota', and 'Whittaker' produced one or more root suckers during the experiment (Table 9). ... There were < 4 replications from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', and 'Whittaker' that produced suckers (Table 9).
50explicit_cultivar_referenceReplications from Hazel and South Dakota, and single replications from Compass, Gracious, Monitor, and Whittaker (Table 9).
80explicit_cultivar_referenceMonitor 25.0 abc 33.3 ab 16.7 bcde 0.8 1.9
101explicit_cultivar_referenceAverage % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage
108explicit_cultivar_referenceAverage % stainability for ‘Monitor’ decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage (Table 2).
109explicit_cultivar_referenceAverage % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage.
111explicit_cultivar_referenceAfter seven months in storage, % stainability decreased significantly for the plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’, which indicates that relatively short-term (<=6 months) storage of pollen may not result in a significant reduction of viability.
112explicit_cultivar_reference'Except for the plums ‘Monitor’ and ‘Superior’, all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars’ pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at least nine months.'
118explicit_cultivar_reference'Monitor' 1920 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997

Raw Parsed Claims

PageTypeClaimConfidence
47entry_hardiness_observationIn 25-month field storage tests, 'Monitor' is at the low end of the plum germination range at 4.2% (Table 5).0.9
48description_snippetIn Experiment III, field-grown plum seedlings from 'Monitor' are reported at the low end of initial stem diameter (1.16 mm).0.95
49description_snippetMonitor was among the cultivars with root suckers in greenhouse replications.0.95
49description_snippetMonitor had fewer than four greenhouse replications producing root suckers (Table 9).0.93
50description_snippetMonitor is referenced as a plum cultivar with single replications in Table 9.0.9
80description_snippetMonitor is reported with values 25.0, 33.3, 16.7 and average weeks 0.8, 1.9, with significance markers abc, ab, and bcde.0.91
80source_reference_abbreviationThe row uses significance labels abc, ab, and bcde.0.86
101taxon_contextListed as a plum cultivar evaluated in the winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability and storage study.0.95
101storage_durationAverage pollen stainability decreased significantly after seven months of storage at -20°C.0.95
108description_snippetThis cultivar showed a significant drop in average stainability only after about seven or more storage months.0.96
109entry_hardiness_observationPollen stainability for Monitor declined significantly after at least seven months in storage.0.97
111storage_durationPollen stainability for ‘Monitor’ showed a significant decrease after approximately 7 months in storage.0.96
111productivityThe cultivar remains within the thesis’s broader conclusion that reduced stainability may still permit reproduction.0.61
112description_snippetMonitor was explicitly identified as one of the two plum cultivars that did not follow the >50% stainability result at experiment end.0.92
118taxon_contextPlum entry in the continued Prunus Table 1 section.0.92
118release_year_referenceIntroduction year is listed as 1920.0.93
118selection_origin_referenceSource/reference field cites Brooks and Olmo, 1997.0.95
118entry_locationCollection week is Week 18.0.98

Inherited Context

  • p47: Prunus: plum | winter-hardy Prunus | Experiment II plum cultivar subset | plum cultivar comparisons | Results | Experiment II | Plum | % germination and time to germination | University of Minnesota graduate thesis research setting | Germplasm evaluation for winter-hardy Pru
  • p48: plum cultivar trial | Prunus spp. | Table 7/6 comparative growth context | plum cultivar performance cohort | Background on seed-cultivar experiments in winter-hardiness trials | Experiment III (plum seedling growth and establishment comparisons) | References to Table 5, Tab
  • p49: Prunus spp. | plum | plum cultivars | Prunus species thesis | Experiment III | Plum cultivar results | University of Minnesota | Winter-hardy Prunus evaluation research context | University of Minnesota thesis context (temperate field/greenhouse trials)
  • p50: Prunus | plum | plum entries | Prunus spp. hybrids | Results | Experiment III | Correlations and summary | Minnesota | United States
  • p80: Plum (Prunus) trial entries | Prunus species winter-hardiness study | winter-hardy plum cultivars | Plum seed trial comparisons | Table 3 | Table 3: Continued | Plum | University of Minnesota | winter-hardy Prunus species evaluation program | Minnesota, United States
  • p101: Plum cultivar in winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability study | Prunus | Plum grouping used for this storage result | No explicit hybrid designator | Chapter 2 | Summary | University of Minnesota, Department of Horticultural Science | Plant breeding context centered on evalua
  • p108: Prunus cultivars in pollen stainability analysis | Winter-hardy Prunus species and cultivars | apricot/plum/tart cherry viability comparison | Plum/cherry/apricot cultivar groups | Results carryover from prior table-driven viability comparisons | Discussion | University of
  • p109: Prunus | plum germplasm
  • p111: Prunus plum cultivar | Winter-hardy Prunus taxa | Plum entries evaluated in storage-duration comparison | Plum cultivar subgroup under winter-hardy Prunus pollen studies | Method and results discussion | Conclusions | University of Minnesota, graduate thesis program | Evalu
  • p112: Prunus | winter-hardy Prunus cultivars | winter-hardy Prunus | University of Minnesota | University of Minnesota Prunus germplasm/crossing context | Minnesota
  • p118: Plum subsection of Table 1 | Prunus spp. | Non-hybrid Prunus spp. entry | No hybrid notation | Table 1 continuation listing fruit type, species, cultivar name, introduction year, collection week, and citation for Prunus cultivars. | University of Minnesota thesis repository

Cultivar Citation Focus: This reader is filtered to citation evidence linked to Monitor (ID 143) within document 7. Use the rows below to jump the PDF directly to relevant passages.

Citation focus: cultivar focus: Monitor (ID 143) | page focus: 109

Choose a citation row to jump the PDF view. The `focus` term is sent to browser PDF search where supported.

PageTypeQuoteClaimEntityJump
47entry_hardiness_observationFor seed stored for 25 months, averages ranged from 4.2% for 'Monitor', 'Mount Royal' and 'Pipestone' to 95.8% for 'Hennepin' (Table 5).In 25-month field storage tests, 'Monitor' is at the low end of the plum germination range at 4.2% (Table 5).cultivar 143Open Review parse
48description_snippetAverages for seedlings started in the field ranged from 1.16 mm for seedlings from 'Monitor' to 2.39 mm for seedlings from 'Todd' with 'Todd' differing significantly from a number of plum cultivars (Table 7).Monitor is a plum cultivar used in field initial stem diameter analysis and is the lower anchor of the stated field range (1.16 mm).cultivar 143Open Review parse
49description_snippet... from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', 'South Dakota', and 'Whittaker' produced one or more root suckers during the experiment (Table 9). ... There were < 4 replications from 'Todd', 'Gracious', 'Monitor', and 'WhittakeMonitor was among the cultivars with root suckers in greenhouse replications.cultivar 143Open Review parse
50description_snippetReplications from Hazel and South Dakota, and single replications from Compass, Gracious, Monitor, and Whittaker (Table 9).Monitor is referenced as a plum cultivar with single replications in Table 9.cultivar 143Open Review parse
52description_snippet"Prunus spp. ‘Monitor’ had variable germination percentages across environments, scarification treatments and seed storage."Germination pattern was variable across environments, scarification, and storage conditions.cultivar 143Open Review parse
52recommendation_context"Prunus spp. ‘Monitor’ had variable germination percentages across environments, scarification treatments and seed storage."Its variable germination is presented as potentially reducing relative invasiveness versus high-germinating cultivars.cultivar 143Open Review parse
73entry_locationMonitor HRC x x 13 2Collection/source field on this row is HRC.cultivar 143Open Review parse
73description_snippetMonitor HRC x x 13 2The row is captured as 'Monitor HRC x x 13 2'.cultivar 143Open Review parse
80taxon_contextPlum 'Monitor' 25.0 abc 33.3 ab; 16.7 bcde; 0.8; 1.9.This cultivar entry is part of the Plum rows in Table 3.cultivar 143Open Review parse
80description_snippetPlum 'Monitor' 25.0 abc 33.3 ab; 16.7 bcde; 0.8; 1.9.Row includes treatment values 25.0 and 33.3 plus trailing values 16.7, 0.8, 1.9 with annotations abc / ab / bcde.cultivar 143Open Review parse
84description_snippet'Monitor' 54.2 abcd 66.7 2.1 2.0Monitor shows non-scarified germination of 54.2 with group abcd and scarified germination of 66.7.cultivar 143Open Review parse
86storage_durationTable 5: Continued ... 'Monitor' 4.2 d 0.0 cPlum 'Monitor' field germination was 4.2% at 25 months and 0.0% at 1 month (Table 5).cultivar 143Open Review parse
86description_snippetTable 5: Continued ... 'Monitor' 4.2 d 0.0 cIncluded in the plum continuation of Table 5.cultivar 143Open Review parse
88description_snippetPrunus spp. ‘Monitor’ 51.0 ab 4.29 bc 0.19 4.53Prunus spp. 'Monitor' appears with the values 51.0 ab, 4.29 bc, 0.19, and 4.53 in the continuation table row set.cultivar 143Open Review parse
88source_reference_abbreviationPrunus spp. ‘Monitor’ 51.0 ab 4.29 bc 0.19 4.53Entry is embedded in Table 6: Continued with no separate figure or narrative context on this page.cultivar 143Open Review parse
101storage_durationAverage % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage.Pollen stainability for Monitor decreased significantly after seven months of storage at -20°C.cultivar 143Open Review parse
101description_snippetAverage % stainability for plums ‘La Crescent’, ‘Monitor’, and ‘Toka’ decreased significantly after seven months in storage whereas ‘Superior’ had a significant decrease in as few as three months in storage.Monitor is included with La Crescent and Toka as plum cultivars with significant storage-related decline.cultivar 143Open Review parse
108storage_durationAverage % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage whereas 'Superior' had significant decreases after just three months in storage (Table 2).Monitor showed significant decreases in pollen stainability after seven or more months of storage.cultivar 143Open Review parse
109storage_durationAverage % stainability for 'La Crescent', 'Monitor', and 'Toka' decreased significantly after seven or more months in storage.Stainability declined significantly after seven or more months in storage.cultivar 143Open Review parse
111storage_durationAfter seven months in storage, % stainability decreased significantly for the plums La Crescent, Monitor, and Toka.Monitor pollen showed significant stainability decline after seven months in storage.cultivar 143Open Review parse
111source_reference_abbreviationAfter seven months in storage, % stainability decreased significantly for the plums La Crescent, Monitor, and Toka.Statistical change is reported with reference to the study’s Table 2 data.cultivar 143Open Review parse
112description_snippetExcept for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at leMonitor is a plum cultivar named in the winter-hardy Prunus pollen viability comparison and is identified as an exception that did not retaicultivar 143Open Review parse
112entry_hardiness_observationExcept for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at leMonitor's pollen longevity in storage appears lower than the page-level majority, while many cultivars remained above 50 percent stainabilitcultivar 143Open Review parse
112source_reference_abbreviationExcept for the plums 'Monitor' and 'Superior', all cultivars had >50% stainability at the end of the experiment, which indicates that the majority of cultivars' pollen could potentially remain viable in storage for at lePrimary evidence is from Kostick 2016, A Survey of Winter-Hardy Prunus Species: Evaluation of Seed Germination, Seedling Establishment, and cultivar 143Open Review parse
118release_year_reference'Monitor' 1920 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Introduction year listed as 1920.cultivar 143Open Review parse
118source_reference_abbreviation'Monitor' 1920 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Source citation given as Brooks and Olmo, 1997.cultivar 143Open Review parse
118entry_location'Monitor' 1920 Week 18 Brooks and Olmo, 1997Collection week is shown as Week 18.cultivar 143Open Review parse
122storage_duration'Monitor' 87% A-F 85% BC 86% A-C 88% B-G 81% B-G 76% B-D 75% D-H 70% D-G 58% GH 48% JMonitor has stored values of 87%, 85%, 86%, 88%, 81%, 76%, 75%, 70%, 58%, and 48% for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 months respectively.cultivar 143Open Review parse
122description_snippet'Monitor' 87% A-F 85% BC 86% A-C 88% B-G 81% B-G 76% B-D 75% D-H 70% D-G 58% GH 48% JIts row includes group letters A-F, BC, A-C, B-G, B-G, B-D, D-H, D-G, GH, and Jby month.cultivar 143Open Review parse

Open PDF directly

Embedded viewer uses the local archived PDF directly for more reliable rendering.

Linked Cultivars

IDCultivarEvidence / ClaimsRelationshipsHistory / PagesLink
1470Northstar3700Open cultivar
173Moongold3300Open cultivar
143Monitor3100Open cultivar
1419Mount Royal3100Open cultivar
1469Sungold3100Open cultivar
1405South Dakota3000Open cultivar
1471Meteor2900Open cultivar
1403Hazel2800Open cultivar
1487Westcot2700Open cultivar
394Compass2600Open cultivar
1475Whittaker2600Open cultivar
1409Hennepin2500Open cultivar
1490Bali2500Open cultivar
1491Suda2500Open cultivar
1494Gracious2400Open cultivar
1472Alderman2300Open cultivar
140Superior2000Open cultivar
1397La Crescent2000Open cultivar
157Toka1900Open cultivar
1488Debbie'S Gold1800Open cultivar
1493Nbi7551600Open cultivar
1498Winona1600Open cultivar
1499Todd1600Open cultivar
1489Mnzo31400Open cultivar
142Underwood1300Open cultivar
146Pipestone1200Open cultivar
1474Prunus Americana1200Open cultivar
1473Prunus Serotina1100Open cultivar
1512Mesabi900Open cultivar
1501Prunus Munsoniana 'Whittaker'800Open cultivar
1549Surecrop800Open cultivar
1492Nb7155600Open cultivar
170Montmorency500Open cultivar
1504Prunus Cerasus 'Stevnsbaer Brigitte'500Open cultivar
257Pioneer400Open cultivar
290Redcoat400Open cultivar
1476Prunus Cerasus400Open cultivar
1479Prunus Angustifolia400Open cultivar
1500Prunus Americana 'Hazel'400Open cultivar
1503Prunus Domestica 'Mount Royal'400Open cultivar
1506Prunus Spp400Open cultivar
1509Prunus Spp 'South Dakota'400Open cultivar
1516Mns98400Open cultivar
1484Prunus Armeniaca300Open cultivar
1505Tart Cherry Cultivars300Open cultivar
1508Prunus Spp 'Winona'300Open cultivar
1510Prunus Spp 'Hennepin'300Open cultivar
1513Prunus Nigra 'Bounty'300Open cultivar
1514Prunus Spp 'Alderman'300Open cultivar
1515Prunus Spp 'Gracious'300Open cultivar
1517Apricot 'Moongold'300Open cultivar
1518Apricot 'Sungold'300Open cultivar
1531Plum 'Whittaker'300Open cultivar
1537Plum 'Monitor'300Open cultivar
1538Plum 'South Dakota'300Open cultivar
656Dakota200Open cultivar
1478Prunus Domestica200Open cultivar
1485Prunus Persica Batsch200Open cultivar
1497Tecomseh200Open cultivar
1502Japanese-American Hybrid 'South Dakota'200Open cultivar
1507Prunus Domestica 'Todd'200Open cultivar
1511Prunus Munsoniana200Open cultivar
1519Apricot 'Westcot'200Open cultivar
1520Tart Cherry 'Bali'200Open cultivar
1525Plum 'Hazel'200Open cultivar
1526Plum 'Compass'200Open cultivar
1527Plum 'Mount Royal'200Open cultivar
1528Plum 'Opal'200Open cultivar
1529Plum 'Stanley'200Open cultivar
1530Plum 'Todd'200Open cultivar
1532Plum 'Bounty'200Open cultivar
1533Plum 'Alderman'200Open cultivar
1534Plum 'Gracious'200Open cultivar
1535Prunus Spp 'Monitor'200Open cultivar
1536Prunus Spp 'Pipestone'200Open cultivar
1539Plum 'Hennepin'200Open cultivar
1540Plum 'Pipestone'200Open cultivar
1541Plum 'Winona'200Open cultivar
1548P. Nigra200Open cultivar
1477Prunus Persica100Open cultivar
1480Prunus Cerasifera100Open cultivar
1481Prunus Spinosa100Open cultivar
1482Prunus Virginiana100Open cultivar
1483Prunus Campanulata100Open cultivar
1486Prunus Angustifolia Marsh100Open cultivar
1495Opal100Open cultivar
1496Stanley100Open cultivar
1521Tart Cherry 'Mesabi'100Open cultivar
1522Tart Cherry 'Meteor'100Open cultivar
1523Tart Cherry 'Nbi755'100Open cultivar
1524Tart Cherry 'Suda'100Open cultivar
1542P. Armeniaca100Open cultivar
1543P. Cerasus100Open cultivar
1544P. Americana100Open cultivar
1545P. Besseyi X. Prunus Spp100Open cultivar
1546P. Domestica100Open cultivar
1547P. Munsoniana100Open cultivar
1550Kutahya100Open cultivar
parsed only'Northstar'15071, 85, 87, 90, 95, 97, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Meteor'14071, 85, 87, 90, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Bali'12085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Winona'12074, 81, 84, 92, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Monitor'11073, 84, 92, 98, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Moongold'11085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mount Royal'11030, 71, 79, 97, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Westcot'11085, 87, 90, 95, 97, 117, ...No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Alderman'10072, 79, 84, 97, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Gracious'10072, 79, 84, 95, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mesabi'10071, 117, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'South Dakota'10073, 84, 92, 98, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Sungold'10085, 87, 90, 97, 117, 120No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Underwood'10074, 119, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Compass'9071, 79, 95, 97, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Pipestone'9073, 84, 92, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Toka'9073, 119, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Hennepin'8073, 84, 97, 98No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Suda'8071, 85, 95, 97, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Todd'7072, 79, 95, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Nbi755'60117, 121No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Whittaker'6072, 79, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Bounty'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Hazel'5071, 95, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'La Crescent'5073, 122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Opal'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Pioneer'50117, 120No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Stanley'5072, 79No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Montmorency’5013, 61No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Debbie'S Gold'4085, 87, 97No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Superior'4073, 123No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Mns98'3073No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Redcoat'3073No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Cerasus 'Northstar'3030No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Emarginata3059No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Hazel’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Meteor’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Northstar’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Whittaker’3061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Debbie’S Gold'2090No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only'Surecrop'20122No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. bessyi x P. hortulana 'Compass'2088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. cerasus 'Suda'2088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Avium2059No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Besseyi Prunus Spp2099No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus Nigra2099No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus virginiana L2055No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Hennepin’2061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Monitor’2052No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘South Dakota’2061No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. americana 'Hazel'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. domestica 'Mount Royal'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyP. munsoniana 'Whittaker'1088No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus cerasus L1028No staging cultivar page yet
parsed onlyPrunus domestica L1028No staging cultivar page yet
parsed only‘Gracious’1097No staging cultivar page yet

Document-Linked Records

Relationships: 0

History events: 24

These are the structured records currently tied to this document. They should line up with the document’s main cultivar story.

Rights Records

StatusLicenseHolder
unknown

Credibility Records

TierScoreAssessorRationale
tier_188autoAcademic institutional domain

Translation Records

Source LangTarget LangMethodStatusNote
No translation records.

Translation Quality Assessments

Translation IDScoreRiskAssessorRationale
No translation assessments.

Publication Records

StatusVisibilityReviewerNote
No publication records.

Extracted Entities

TypeValueConfidence
taxon_keywordprunus0.75

Extracted Claims

TypeClaimConfidence
description_snippetFrom public gardens to homeowners, Prunus species provide a multitude of options for ornamental use.0.54
description_snippetavium L.) and tart (P.0.54
ornamental_useornamental use0.56
culinary_usejelly and dried fruit0.56
storage_durationstorage………………………………………………………………………1110.56
storage_durationstorage……………………………………………………………………………………730.56
storage_durationstorage on pollen viability in winter-hardy0.56
selection_origin_referencewestern Asia to southern Europe whereas the Japanese plum (P0.57
selection_origin_referenceEurope to North America to0.57
selection_origin_referenceChina not Persia, modern-day Iran (Das et al0.57
release_year_reference20150.68
breeding_crossgermination in the field environments of E x periments I or II0.65
breeding_crossgermination in the field environment of E x periment II for Prunus0.65
breeding_crossGreenhouse environment of E x periment I0.65
breeding_crossenvironments of E x periment I0.65
breeding_crossand cultivar for germplasm examined in E x periment I0.65
year_reference20040.55
year_reference19960.55
year_reference20130.55
year_reference19930.55
year_reference20010.55
year_reference20080.55
year_reference20120.55
year_reference19940.55
year_reference20110.55
year_reference20150.55
year_reference20140.55
year_reference19260.55
year_reference20090.55
year_reference19410.55
year_reference20160.55